The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Internet providers seek bill to rein in tech giants

- By Brian Fung

As Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Facebook, defends his company’s data practices this week before Congress, one of the nation’s largest cable companies is asking federal lawmakers for a bill that would rein in social media platforms, search engines and other tech giants.

The proposal by Charter Communicat­ions Monday calls for requiring “greater privacy and data security protection­s” of companies such as Google and Facebook, whose Cambridge Analytica fiasco has inflamed a debate about Silicon Valley’s handling of consumers’ personal informatio­n.

“Recent revelation­s have led to a long-overdue public conversati­on about what happens to our data online and the vulnerabil­ities that could develop,” Tom Rutledge, Charter’s chief executive, wrote in a blog post Monday. Rutledge said the new rules should also apply to internet providers such as Charter, whose services reach more than 22 million homes.

Charter’s call to more heavily regulate Facebook and Google reflects longstandi­ng tensions between broadband providers and Silicon Valley after years of policy battles under the techfriend­ly Obama administra­tion. That rivalry is only growing as internet providers seek a piece of the $209 billion digital advertisin­g market that has been dominated by Bay Area companies

who hold vast troves of personal informatio­n on consumers.

Now, amid rising political scrutiny of the biggest names in tech, the policy proposals from Rutledge and others could put broadband companies in a stronger position to carve out their own place in the digital ad market — while convenient­ly placing new restrictio­ns on their rivals in Silicon Valley.

Internet providers have stepped up critiques of technology companies as tech’s fortunes in Washington have waned. In January, AT&T called on Congress to pass a national net neutrality law that applies not only to broadband providers, as advocates of the concept initially envisioned, but also to massive tech platforms.

“Congressio­nal action is needed to establish an ‘Internet Bill of Rights’ that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality, transparen­cy, openness,

non-discrimina­tion and privacy protection for all internet users,” AT&T’s chief executive, Randall Stephenson, wrote in the ad.

The ad blitz was politicall­y welltimed. It came days after conservati­ve activists led by James O’Keefe published a series of videos claiming to uncover partisan bias at Twitter, including the use of “shadowbans” to allegedly suppress right-wing accounts on the platform. That same month, Google was hit with a lawsuit alleging discrimina­tion against conservati­ve employees such as James Damore, an engineer who left the company after he penned an explosive memo criticizin­g Google’s hiring practices.

The disarray and tumult afflicting the tech industry is an opportunit­y for internet providers to gain a bigger foothold with policymake­rs, according to Susan

Crawford, a Harvard University law professor.

“Charter is using the cur- rent kerfuffle over Facebook to divert any regula- tory energy that might have been heading its way towards Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google,” said Crawford.

The tug-of-war between tech platforms and inter- net providers over regula- tion goes back years. When the Federal Communicat­ions Commission passed its now-defunct net neutrality rules in 2015, it was a major defeat for broadband providers. Opponents of the rules blamed tech companies such as Netflix for making the regulation­s more expansive.

Google became an even bigger thorn in the cable industry’s side when exec- utives said the search giant was interested in building a product that could free consumers from the bulky TV set-top boxes required for watching subscripti­on television.

The two industries battled each other at the FCC over new rules for set-top boxes until cable companies emerged with their own competing proposal, and the FCC’s Democratic chair- man, Tom Wheeler, ended his tenure without bringing the issue to a vote.

Since then, internet providers have become increasing­ly open about their desire to challenge tech companies for dominance over the digital ad market, which is now bigger than the traditiona­l

TV ad market, according to industry research.

Goo g le a nd Facebo ok alone account for 63 percent of all revenues in dig- ital ads, according to the research firm eMarketer.

Gigi Sohn, a former adviser to Wheeler, said the push by internet providers should not distract from “ISPs’ own anti-consumer and anticom- petitive behavior,” such as their efforts to stymie the

FCC’s comparativ­ely strict privacy and net neutrality policies.

“Broadband ISPs and tech companies are both critical parts of the internet ecosystem, and both need greater

Congressio­nal and regulatory oversight,” she said.

 ?? JEFF ROBERSON / ASSOCIATED PRESS 2015 ?? Charter Communicat­ions on Monday called for requiring “greater privacy and data security protection­s” of companies such as Google and Facebook.
JEFF ROBERSON / ASSOCIATED PRESS 2015 Charter Communicat­ions on Monday called for requiring “greater privacy and data security protection­s” of companies such as Google and Facebook.
 ??  ?? Rutledge
Rutledge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States