Manafort trial judge chastises attorneys

ALEXANDRIA, VA. — The judge in Paul Manafort’s financial fraud trial warned prosecutors Wednesday against using the word “oligarchs” to describe wealthy Ukrainians, and admonished them for spending so much time documenting the former Trump campaign chairman’s extravagant lifestyle.

It’s not a crime to be wealthy, said U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III. And the pejorative term “oligarchs” and evidence of home renovations aren’t necessarily relevant to the charges in question, he added. At one point, Ellis even called out lawyers from both sides for rolling their eyes.

“Let’s move it along,” Ellis said repeatedly.

Prosecutor Greg Andres argued that Manafort’s spending was important to the case.

“Judge, this is not an effort to prove Mr. Manafort lived lavishly,” Andres said. “It’s evidence of his income.”

The trial is the first courtroom test for special counsel Robert Mueller, who was tasked last year with investigating Russia’s efforts to sway the 2016 election and to determine whether the Trump campaign was involved. So far, Manafort is the lone person to stand trial as a result of the ongoing probe, even though the charges of bank fraud and tax evasion are unrelated to possible collusion.

Still, the trial pulled back the curtain on the former lobbyist who steered Trump’s election efforts for a time, including descriptions of Manafort’s $15,000 jacket made of ostrich and the more than $6 million in cash he put toward real estate. One witness, Maximillian Katzman, testified that Manafort spent more than $900,000 at his boutique retailer in New York. He said Manafort was the only business client of his who paid via international wire transfer.

At one point, an FBI agent described the July 2017 raid on Manafort’s Virginia condominium. He said he knocked multiple times before entering with a key after no one answered, only to find Manafort sitting inside.

The searches described by agent Matthew Mikuska found expensive suits and documents related to other luxury items allegedly bought by Manafort, including two silk rugs bought for $160,000, paid from offshore accounts.

But when prosecutors introduced photos of Manafort’s high-end condo and expensive suits, Ellis interrupted so as to limit the growing list of evidence jurors would have to consider.

“All this document shows is that Mr. Manafort had a lavish lifestyle,” Ellis said at one point. “It isn’t relevant.”

On the term “oligarchs,” Ellis said use of the word implied that Manafort was associating with “despicable people, and therefore he’s despicable. That’s not the American way,” he said.

The proceedings, which could last weeks, caught the attention of President Donald Trump, who defended his 2016 hiring of Manafort and suggested Manafort was being treated worse than mobster Al Capone.

“Why didn’t government tell me that he was under investigation,” Trump tweeted Wednesday. “These old charges have nothing to do with Collusion - a Hoax!”

Manafort’s defense attorneys are putting blame on Manafort’s business associate Rick Gates, who has pleaded guilty in Mueller’s investigation and is now the government’s star witness. Gates also worked on the Trump campaign.