The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Afghans glad U.S., Taliban talks called off

Many expressed fear that U.S. would make too many concession­s.

- By Pamela Constable

Afghan KABUL, AFGHANISTA­N — officials, analysts and citizens on Sunday cautiously welcomed President Donald Trump’s announceme­nt that he was calling off the troubled U.S.-Taliban peace talks aimed at ending the 18-year conflict.

After weeks of mounting uncertaint­y and suspicion here, with

insurgent violence raging across the country even as a bilateral deal neared, Trump’s surprising tweets late Saturday seemed to burst the pent-up tension across Afghan society and offer a moment of relief — even as it created new fears over what would come next.

The Taliban, for their part, waited all day before issuing a coolly worded statement saying they had been ready to sign a peace agreement with the United States, but Trump’s impatience had sabotaged the process and

the insurgents would now continue their “jihad” against foreign “occupation.”

The days before Trump’s bombshell were filled with conflictin­g signals from Taliban and U.S. leaders. While U.S. negotiator­s said a deal was imminent, Taliban attacks intensifie­d. Outside the negotiatio­ns, an array of U.S. politician­s, military leaders and diplomats warned that a hasty deal and troop pullout could lead to chaos and even civil war.

Afghans on Sunday expressed measured relief.

“There is definitely a silver lining to this,” said Haroun Mir, an analyst based in Kabul. “There was total confusion before. Everyone was afraid the U.S. would sign a cease-fire but the Taliban would continue their war against the Afghan government and people.

“Now President Trump has personally rectified this with his own tweet.”

Few Afghans had trusted the closed-door negotiatio­ns between the United States and the Taliban. Many expressed fears that the Trump administra­tion would make too many concession­s to the insurgents, giving them free rein to reimpose extreme Islamic rule and sacrificin­g gains in rights and freedoms under democratic rule.

President Ashraf Ghani, who had fumed for months about being excluded from the talks, prepared to fly to Washington this weekend, without public explanatio­n. Aides said Friday the trip had been postponed.

In his tweets Saturday, Trump said he was canceling secret meetings planned with Taliban leaders and Ghani at Camp David after the most recent Taliban attack, a bombing Thursday near the U.S. Embassy in Kabul that killed a U.S. service member, 10 Afghans and a Romanian soldier.

It was not clear whether Taliban leaders had agreed to participat­e or not. In the statement late Sunday, they made no mention of meetings.

A spokesman for Ghani declined Sunday to say what he had planned to do in Washington beyond expressing his concerns about the talks.

The Ghani government strongly welcomed Trump’s announceme­nt early Sunday, saying it coincided with official worries here that the Taliban were manipulati­ng the peace process. Officials reiterated Ghani’s long-standing insistence that only direct bilateral talks between Afghan and Taliban leaders could bring about an enduring and substantiv­e settlement.

Ghani’s chief spokesman said Trump’s decision “showed he has a proper understand­ing of the situation and sees that the Taliban are not committed to peace.”

Spokesman Sediq Sediqqi thanked the United States for its efforts, but said now the Taliban must “stop killing Afghans and agree to negotiate directly with the Afghan government. We have always been behind a meaningful peace process and we will always be the implemente­r of that process.”

Sediqqi also said direct talks among Afghans could not begin any time soon because of ongoing attacks.

“We do not have conditions for talks, but peace has conditions,” he said. “How is it possible to sit in talks and continue the violence?” He said the Taliban had been enjoying a “honeymoon” in Qatar, the site of the negotiatio­ns, while “cheating Afghanista­n and the world. This needs to come to an end.”

It was unclear what impact Trump’s actions would have on presidenti­al elections scheduled for Sept. 28. Until now, U.S. officials were pressing for the peace talks to finish in time to hold Afghan-Taliban talks before the vote. Many Afghans had called for the election to be postponed, fearing it could disrupt the peace process. But Sediqqi said Sunday it would be held on schedule. Ghani has been running hard for reelection despite Taliban threats to attack the polls.

Rahmatulla­h Nabil, a former national intelligen­ce chief, is one of several candidates who offered to quit the race in the interest of peace.

“It is time for the Taliban to step forward, stop the bloodshed, announce a cease-fire and start direct talks with the Afghan side,” he said.

The Taliban said late Sunday they were still prepared to return to the table, but Trump’s abrupt cancellati­on of bilateral talks would harm America and “increase its financial and human losses.”

If talks are not resumed, spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said, “we will continue to (wage) jihad” and “put an end to the total occupation” of Afghanista­n.

 ?? THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Many Afghans expressed fears that the U.S. would make too many concession­s to the insurgents, giving them free rein to reimpose extreme Islamic rule.
THE NEW YORK TIMES Many Afghans expressed fears that the U.S. would make too many concession­s to the insurgents, giving them free rein to reimpose extreme Islamic rule.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States