Courtroom hugs for officer test limits of forgiveness

Amber Guyger got off easy.

Amber Guyger got what she deserved.

It’s easy to be in either camp — or, for the truly ambivalent, be in both camps at once.

One thing is certain: Botham Jean is dead. Guyger killed him.

Which only brings up the very troubling question: Would she have made that mistake if Jean had not been black and she were not white?

Guyger, who lived in the same building but on a different floor, told authorities she mistakenly had entered Jean’s apartment, thinking it was her own. When she saw Jean, she said, she thought he was an intruder and shot him in the chest.

The story quickly went viral on national news and the web, partly because of the tantalizing racial angle.

But this case also was tougher than those others. There was no controversy connected to Botham’s name before his death. He hadn’t been stopped by police on the street or driving his car. He was quietly eating ice cream in his own home.

Yet, successful prosecutions of police officers are rare, civil libertarians and police brutality specialists say. Guyger’s tearful remorse also made her an exceptionally sympathetic figure, perhaps too sympathetic, many reasoned, for the jury to find her guilty of murder instead of, say, knocking the charge down to manslaughter.

She didn’t get off that easy, although it could have been worse. Guyger was sentenced to 10 years, eligible for parole after five.

The average sentence for an on-duty officer convicted of murder is about 12 years, Philip Stinson, a legal expert on police shootings, told The Dallas Morning News. Stinson said although Guyger was off duty at the time of Jean’s shooting, her sentence was similar to those handed down for officers convicted of murders committed while on duty.

But the drama of Guyger’s sentencing was almost upstaged by a surprising display of compassion for her by Brandt Jean, Botham’s 18-year-old brother.

“I think giving your life to Christ would be the best thing that Botham would want for you,” he said, addressing his victim impact statement toward her. “I love you as a person, and I don’t wish anything bad on you.”

He told Guyger that he didn’t even want her to go to prison. Then he asked for permission to give her a hug. Guyger responded by rushing across the courtroom to join him in a big long hug.

Then the judge, who also is African American, also gave her a hug and a Bible.

The poignant scene coming across national television and computer screens reminded me of the survivors and victims’ families of the mass shooting by a white supremacist at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina.

Such expressions of forgiveness after the Charleston shooting and in Dallas received a mixed response from black community leaders and citizens. “What white people are really asking for when they demand forgiveness from a traumatized community is absolution,” wrote Roxane Gay in The New York Times about why she could not forgive Dylan Roof, the Charleston killer. “They want absolution from the racism that infects us all even though forgiveness cannot reconcile America’s racist sins,” she wrote. She’s not alone. I do not easily forgive killers such as Guyger or Roof, either, unless they show that they understand the errors of their ways and are willing and ready to change themselves for the better. Guyger, at least, appears ready, but first she must serve her sentence.