PISA testing indicates U.S. students’ gains fluctuate

Official: Weaker scores for low-income kids troubling.

A friend and I were browsing in an art gallery recently when we stopped in front of an oversized abstract canvas with autumnal tones. “This gives me a sense of home,” I told her.

“Makes me think of death,” she said. The unveiling of student scores on the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment, better known as PISA, last week produced similar divergent reactions.

The performance of American 15-year-olds on the international benchmark exam heartened some education advocates, while it drove others to despair. American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, for example, said, “Even in the face of Betsy DeVos’ and Donald Trump’s undermining of public schooling, it’s no coincidence that during an era of unprecedented teacher activism demanding more public investment, and a decline in high-stakes testing after the 2015 overhaul of federal education law, that we see an uptick in U.S. PISA results.”

But Anthony Mackay, president and CEO of the National Center on Education and the

Economy, said, “We cannot be satisfied with flatlining. The time for a reset to the U.S. education system is now. The 2018 PISA results show again that U.S. high school students are failing to keep up with their counterparts in industrialized countries.”

In a media call with reporters, Andreas Schleicher, director of education and skills at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which administers the exam, described American trend lines on PISA as “fairly steady.”

American students struggled with math as they always have, he said, but they improved in science.

Yes, there is an achievement gap in the United States, but Schleicher said, “It is not exceptionally large.”

Socioeconomic status proved a strong predictor of performance in most countries. Among the countries seeing a widening gap was Finland, which has been held up as a model of equity and excellence. The performance of affluent Finnish students remains high, but the country’s lowest-income kids are falling behind.

Begun in 2000 and administered every three years to a sampling of students in participating countries and economies, PISA is a two-hour test on reading, math and science.

About 600,000 students in 79 countries and economies took the test in 2018, representing about 32 million 15-year-olds. In the United States, 4,838 students in 215 public and private schools completed the assessment, which is scored on a scale from 0 to 1,000.

In this round of testing, PISA paid close attention to reading. In an age of manipulated and distorted information, PISA attempted to discern whether students could tell fact from opinion. On average across nations, only 9.9% of students could. America outpaced the rest of the countries; 13.5% of U.S. students could navigate ambiguity and resolve conflicting pieces of information.

Among the key findings about the performance of American students:

■ U.S. students performed above the average in reading, scoring 505 compared to the overall average of 487 among peer nations. In math, they scored 478, below the international average score of 489. In science, they scored 502, above the international average of 489.

■ Girls outperformed boys in reading by 24 score points. Boys outperformed girls in math by 9 points. In science, boys and girls performed similarly.

■ Among high-performing U.S. math or science students, about 3 in 10 boys expect to work as an engineer or science professional at the age of 30, but only 1 in 10 girls expects to do so.

■ In the United States, 81% of students attained at least Level 2 proficiency in reading, surpassing the 77% average for all participating countries. Level 2 means students can identify the main idea in a text of moderate length, find information based on explicit, though sometimes complex criteria, and can reflect on the purpose and form of texts.

■ About 14% of U.S. students excelled in reading, attaining a Level 5 or 6. (The average across all countries was only 9%). In math, 8% of U.S. students scored at Level 5 or higher; across all countries the average was 11%. In science, 9% of U.S. students were top performers, outpacing the international average of 7%.

■ Affluent students outperformed lower-income students. While about 27% of advantaged U.S. students were top performers in reading, only 4% of disadvantaged students were.

Schleicher warned the United States and other countries with performance gaps ought to be concerned, saying, “Our labor markets were a lot more tolerant of education failure in the past than they are now, so students who do not make the grade face pretty grim prospects.”