The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Proposed U.S. rules would increase organ transplant­s

Efforts being made to ensure organs from the dead won’t go to waste.

- By Lauran Neergaard

WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is overhaulin­g parts of the nation’s transplant system to make sure organs from the dead no longer go to waste — and to make it easier for the living to donate.

What’s happening

The rules proposed Tuesday aim to ease an organ shortage so severe that more than 113,000 Americans linger on the transplant waiting list — and about 20 die each day.

Part of the reason: An Associated Press analysis recently found some of the groups that collect organs at death secure donors at half the rate of others, missed opportunit­ies that could have saved lives. But the government currently has little way to directly compare organ collection agencies and force poor performers to improve.

“No life-saving organ should go to waste,” Medicare chief Seema Verma said in announcing stricter standards to hold those agencies more accountabl­e.

At the same time, the administra­tion also aims to spur more living donors by allowing them to be reimbursed for lost wages and child care or elder care expenses incurred during their hospitaliz­ation and recovery.

What both sides are saying

Transplant advocates praised the move.

“Patients are dying, and they deserve better,” Jennifer Erickson, a former Obama administra­tion staffer who worked on transplant policy, said of the crackdown on “organ procuremen­t organizati­ons,” or OPOs.

And the associatio­n that represents those organ collection groups pledged to work with Medicare, which regulates the nonprofits, to implement the tougher standards.

The new rules are “an opportunit­y to drive meaningful changes that will increase the availabili­ty of organs for transplant and save more lives,” Kelly Ranum, CEO of Louisiana’s OPO and president of the associatio­n, said in a statement.

What it means

Today, the country is divided into 58 zones, each assigned an OPO to essentiall­y be a matchmaker — rapidly collecting organs from willing donors at death and getting them to the right transplant center, even if a hospital calls with a potential donor at 3 a.m. It’s hard to tell how well they do the job. They self-report to the government success rates without any way to tell how many potential donations were left behind, or why. And current rules give little incentive for retrieving less-than-perfect organs, such as those from older donors.

“For countless patients, an imperfect organ is better than no organ at all,” Verma said.

Under the proposal, Medicare will calculate each OPO’s donation and transplant­ation rates using federal death records that show the entire pool of potential donors each has to draw from — anyone 75 or younger who dies in a hospital of conditions that wouldn’t automatica­lly preclude donation.

For the first time, that would allow Medicare to rank OPO performanc­e. Verma promised yearly evaluation­s, saying any organ agency that didn’t do as well as the top quarter of their competitor­s would be pushed to improve.

Verma estimated the change could spark another 5,000 transplant­s a year. A 2017 study by University of Pennsylvan­ia researcher­s had estimated that a better-functionin­g system could yield as many as 28,000 additional organs.

What’s next

The proposals are open for public comment for 60 days.

 ?? LAURIE SKRIVAN / ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH ?? The organ shortage in the U.S. is so severe that more than 113,000 Americans linger on the transplant waiting list — and about 20 die each day. Researcher­s had estimated a better-functionin­g system could yield as many as 28,000 additional organs.
LAURIE SKRIVAN / ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH The organ shortage in the U.S. is so severe that more than 113,000 Americans linger on the transplant waiting list — and about 20 die each day. Researcher­s had estimated a better-functionin­g system could yield as many as 28,000 additional organs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States