The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
GOP senator 'disturbed' by McConnell's stance
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, expressed unease in an interview with the Senate majority leader’s vow of “total coordination” with the White House on impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump, a potentially significant crack in Republican unity.
What Murkowski said
Murkowski, a moderate with an independent streak, told Anchorage’s NBC affiliate KTUU she opposed “being hand in glove with the defense” and voiced other concerns as the Senate prepares to hold a trial over the two articles of impeachment that the House approved earlier this month.
In the interview, Murkowski said she was “disturbed” by comments by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky that indicated he intends to work in concert with the White House counsel in planning the impeachment trial.
“In fairness, when I heard that I was disturbed,” Murkowski said. “To me it means that we have to take that step back from being hand in glove with the defense, and so I heard what leader McConnell had said, I happened to think that that has further confused the process.”
Murkowski said she felt that House Democrats had made a mistake in forging ahead with impeachment so quickly without potentially valuable testimony from top White House officials such as former national security adviser John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney, acting chief of staff.
“If the House truly believed that they had information that was going to be important, they subpoena them, and if they ignore the subpoena as they did, at the direction of the White House, then that next step is to go to the courts,” she said.
Why it matters
Murkowski’s views could prove important. She rarely speaks publicly against Republican leadership, but when she does, she tends to stick with her positions, as when she opposed the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh and helped torpedo a repeal of the Affordable Care Act. She also tends to bring Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a fellow moderate, with her, and only a handful of defections would force McConnell to switch course on the upcoming impeachment trial.
Murkowski is one of a small number of Republicans who has not publicly dismissed the case against the president, and says she remains open to considering the case on its merits.
“If it means that I am viewed as one who looks openly and critically at every issue in front of me rather than acting as a rubber stamp for my party or my president, I’m totally good with that,” she said.
What’s next
Senate Democrats are pressing to include testimony at the trial from Bolton and Mulvaney, and support from Murkowski would be critical.
On Dec. 10, a federal judge pushed off a decision on such testimony, responding to a lawsuit by Charles Kupperman, another White House official, who asked the courts to decide whether the House could compel him to testify after he defied a House subpoena in October. The case was expected to provide clarity on whether other officials such as Bolton would have to testify as well.
Instead of prolonging the process, House Democrats moved forward with articles of impeachment based on evidence already collected, formally accusing Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. In a Senate trial to consider removing Trump from office, evidentiary standards would be considerably higher than impeachment, which is akin to an indictment.
Democrats argue Bolton and Mulvaney have firsthand knowledge of the president’s efforts to force Ukraine’s president to help his reelection by publicly announcing an investigation of Trump’s Democratic rivals.