The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Meatpackin­g safety guidelines mostly ineffectua­l

- By Amy Forliti

MINNEAPOLI­S —

Federal recommenda­tions meant to keep meatpackin­g workers safe as they return to plants that were shuttered by the coronaviru­s have little enforcemen­t muscle behind them, fueling anxiety that working conditions could put employees’ lives at risk.

About the guidelines

Extensive guidance issued in April by the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that meatpackin­g companies erect physical barriers, enforce social distancing and install more hand-sanitizing stations, among other steps. But the guidance is not mandatory.

“It’s like, ‘Here’s what we’d like you to do. But if you don’t want to do it, you don’t have to,’” said Mark Lauritsen, internatio­nal vice president and director of the food processing and meatpackin­g division for the United Food and Commercial Workers Internatio­nal Union.

The pandemic is “the most massive workers’ safety crisis in many decades, and OSHA is in the closet. OSHA is hiding,” said David Michaels, an epidemiolo­gist who was the agency’s assistant secretary of labor under President Barack Obama. Michaels called on OSHA to make the guidelines mandatory and enforceabl­e, which would include the threat of fines.

OSHA’s general guidance plainly says the recommenda­tions are advisory and “not a standard or regulation,” and they create “no new legal obligation­s.”

About general duty

But the guidance also says employers must follow a law known as the general duty clause, which requires companies to provide a workplace free of recognized hazards. Critics say that rule is unlikely to be enforced, especially after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in April aimed at keeping meat plants open.

Already, examples have emerged of questionab­le enforcemen­t efforts and pressure to keep plants running:

■ Shortly before Trump’s order, state regulators in Iowa declined to inspect a Tyson Foods pork plant despite a complaint alleging workers had been exposed to the virus in crowded conditions. Documents obtained by The Associated Press show Iowa’s OSHA agency took 2 1/2 weeks to contact Tyson, get a response and conclude that the company’s voluntary efforts to improve social distancing at the Perry plant were “satisfacto­ry.” Within a week later, 730 workers — almost 60% of the workforce — had tested positive.

■ In Kansas, the state softened its quarantine guidelines after industry executives pushed to allow potentiall­y exposed employees to continue going to work, according to emails and text messages obtained by The Kansas City Star and The Wichita Eagle. The state had previously advised such employees to quarantine for two weeks, before conforming to the more lenient CDC guideline, which allows employees to continue working if they have no symptoms and use precaution­s. The move came after Tyson raised a concern with the state of rising worker absenteeis­m.

Adhering to safety

After Trump’s executive order — developed with input from the industry — the Labor Department and OSHA said OSHA would use discretion and consider “good faith attempts” to follow safety recommenda­tions. Employers would be given a chance to explain if some are not met. Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue made clear in letters this month that the Department of Agricultur­e expected state and local officials to work with meat plants to keep them running. And he said any closed plants without a timetable to reopen had to submit protocols to the USDA.

The USDA did not respond to repeated requests to provide those company plans to the AP. When asked how guidelines would be enforced, a USDA spokespers­on said enforcemen­t was up to OSHA.

Major meatpacker­s JBS, Smithfield and Tyson have said worker safety is their highest priority. They provided the AP with summaries of their efforts to improve safety, but the plans themselves have not been made public. Tyson said because the temporary suspension of its operations was voluntary and the company was already meeting or exceeding federal guidance, it was not required to submit a reopening plan to the USDA.

One plan obtained by the AP, for the reopening of a JBS pork plant in Worthingto­n, Minnesota, details multiple safety improvemen­ts, including installing physical barriers, increasing spacing between workers and requiring protective equipment. The plan includes photos. It says employees will be screened for health issues, but it makes no mention of requiring testing.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Federal recommenda­tions meant to keep workers safe as they return to plants have little enforcemen­t behind them, fueling anxiety that conditions could put lives at risk.
ASSOCIATED PRESS Federal recommenda­tions meant to keep workers safe as they return to plants have little enforcemen­t behind them, fueling anxiety that conditions could put lives at risk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States