The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

WHO has to walk back asymptomat­ic comments

- By William Wan and Miriam Berger

The World Health Organizati­on moved Tuesday to clarify its position on whether people without symptoms are widely spreading the new coronaviru­s, saying much remains unknown about asymptomat­ic transmissi­on.

A comment by a WHO official Monday — calling such asymptomat­ic transmissi­ons “very rare” — touched off a furious scientific debate over the unresolved question and attracted widespread criticism of the organizati­on.

Less than 24 hours later, the WHO convened a news conference to walk back its comments, stressing much remains unknown. But the comment from Monday had already spread widely.

The episode sparked criticism of the WHO’s public health messaging and highlighte­d just how fraught and easily politicize­d such work remains months into the pandemic.

Calling the controvers­y “a misunderst­anding,” Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging disease and zoonosis unit, said during the news conference Monday, she was trying to respond to a journalist’s question when she said asymptomat­ic transmissi­on was “very rare.”

“I wasn’t stating a policy of WHO or anything like that,” she said. “We do know that some people who are asymptomat­ic, or some people who do not have symptoms, can transmit the virus on.”

It was not the “intent of WHO to say there is a new or different policy,” added Mike Ryan, head of emergency programs for the WHO. “There is still too much unknown about this virus and still too much unknown about its transmissi­on dynamics.”

While asymptomat­ic transmissi­on does occur, no one knows how frequently it happens. Studies and models have suggested many of those infected never show symptoms. And it remains an open question whether they are a large force driving transmissi­on. Some countries using contact tracing to work backward from confirmed cases have not found many instances of asymptomat­ic spread, WHO officials noted.

At the same time, WHO officials acknowledg­ed Tuesday some modeling studies have suggested as much as 41% of transmissi­on may be due to asymptomat­ic people.

“It’s a mess. I don’t know why they would say asymptomat­ic transmissi­on is very rare when the truth is we simply don’t know how frequent it is,” said Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States