The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Pentagon reverses, says Kabul strike was error

U.S. Central Command chief says only civilians killed, not any extremist.

- By Robert Burns

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon retreated from its defense of a drone strike that killed multiple civilians in Afghanista­n last month, announcing Friday that a review revealed only civilians were killed in the attack, not an Islamic State extremist as first believed.

“The strike was a tragic mistake,” Marine Gen. Frank MCKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, told a Pentagon news conference.

Mckenzie apologized for the error and said the United States is considerin­g making reparation payments to the family of the victims. He said the decision to strike a white Toyota Corolla sedan, after having tracked it for hours, was made in an “earnest belief ” — based on a standard of “reasonable certainty” — that it posed an imminent threat to Americanfo­rces who were securing the Kabul airport. The car was believed to have been carrying explosives in its trunk, he said.

For days after the Aug. 29 strike, Pentagon officials asserted that it had been conducted correctly, despite 10 civilians being

‘I am now convinced that as many as 10 civilians, including up to seven children, were tragically killed in that strike.’ Marine Gen. Frank Mckenzie, head of U.S. Central Command

killed, including seven children. News organizati­ons later raised doubts about that version of events, reporting that the driver of the targeted vehicle was a longtime employee at an American humanitari­an organizati­on and citing an absence of evidence to support the Pentagon’s asser- tion that the vehicle con- tained explosives.

The airstrike was the last of a U.S. war that ended as it had begun in 2001 — with the Taliban in power in Kabul. The speed with which the Taliban overran the country took the U.S. government by surprise and forced it to send several thousand troops to the Kabul airport for a hurried evacuation of Americans, Afghans and others. The evacuation, which began Aug. 14, unfolded under a near-constant threat of attack by the Islamic State group’s Afghanista­n affiliate.

Mckenzie, who oversaw U.S. military operations in Afghanist a n, includ- ing a final evacuation of U.S. forces and more than 120,000 civilians from Kabul airport, expressed his con- dolences to the family and friends of those killed.

“I am now convinced that as many as 10 civilians, including up to seven chil- dren, were tragically killed in that strike,” Mckenzie said. “Moreover, we now assess that it is unlikely that the vehicle and those who died were associated with ISIS-K or were a direct threat to U.S. forces,” he added, referring to the Islamic State group’s Afghanista­n affiliate.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, in a written statement, apologized for what he called “a horrible mistake.”

“We now know that there was no connection” between the driver of the vehicle and the Islamic State group, and that the driver’s activities that day were “completely harmless and not at all related to the immi- nent threat we believed we faced,” Austin said.

Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters two days after the attack that it appeared to have been a “righteous” strike and that

at least one of the people killed was a “facilitato­r” for the Islamic State group’s Afghanista­n affiliate, which had killed 169 Afghan civilians and 13 American service members in a suicide bombing Aug. 26 at the Kabul airport.

After Mckenzie’s remarks Friday, Milley expressed regret.

“This is a horrible tragedy of war, and it’s heart-wrenching,” Milley told reporters traveling with him in Europe. “We are committed to being fully transparen­t about this incident.”

“In a dynamic high-threat environmen­t, the commanders on the ground had appropriat­e authority and had reasonable certainty that the target was valid, but after deeper post-strike analysis, our conclusion is that innocent civilians were killed,” Milley added.

Amnesty Internatio­nal, the humanitari­an aid group, called the U.S. military’s admission of a mistake a good first step.

“The U.S. must now commit to a full, transparen­t and impartial investigat­ion into this incident,” said Brian Castner, a senior crisis adviser with Amnesty Internatio­nal. “Anyone suspected of criminal responsibi­lity should be prosecuted in a fair trial. Survivors and families of the victims should be kept informed of the progress of the investigat­ion and be given full reparation.”

 ?? Families. MANUEL BALCE CENETA/AP 2021 ?? Gen. Frank Mckenzie (right),seen in a virtual Pentagon briefing on Aug. 30 in Washington, said Friday the U.S. is considerin­g reparation­s for airstrike victims’
Families. MANUEL BALCE CENETA/AP 2021 Gen. Frank Mckenzie (right),seen in a virtual Pentagon briefing on Aug. 30 in Washington, said Friday the U.S. is considerin­g reparation­s for airstrike victims’
 ?? KHWAJA TAWFIQ SEDIQI/ASSOCIATED PRESS 2021 ?? Afghans inspect damage Aug. 29 after a U.S. drone strike in Kabul, Afghanista­n. The Pentagon on Friday retreated from its defense of the drone strike, announcing that a review revealed only civilians were killed in the attack, not an Islamic State extremist as first believed. Amnesty Internatio­nal, the humanitari­an aid group, called the U.S. admission of a mistake a good first step.
KHWAJA TAWFIQ SEDIQI/ASSOCIATED PRESS 2021 Afghans inspect damage Aug. 29 after a U.S. drone strike in Kabul, Afghanista­n. The Pentagon on Friday retreated from its defense of the drone strike, announcing that a review revealed only civilians were killed in the attack, not an Islamic State extremist as first believed. Amnesty Internatio­nal, the humanitari­an aid group, called the U.S. admission of a mistake a good first step.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States