The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Board member resigns amid internal investigat­ion

DAFC votes to send report’s findings to law enforcemen­t.

- By J. Scott Trubey scott.trubey@ajc.com

Louis Vuitton handbag valued at $3,400. Some $10,000 in bitcoin. Travel to cryptocurr­ency conference­s and a payment of $1,500 for rent.

That’s what the owner of a company that was trying to gain traction last year at the Developmen­t Authority of Fulton County (DAFC) claims she provided to one of its board mem b ers — Joanna Potts. In exchange, Potts was supposed to help Waterford Logistics create a business plan and obtain financing from the government agency to help fund the company’s new venture. Now the propriety of those gifts

and payments are detailed in a new 112-page report by an outside law firm hired by the DAFC to review the transactio­ns and the entreaties Potts made with the company.

The report does not make any determinat­ion about potential illegal conduct, but said Potts

violated authority, county and state ethics rules, and the authority had cause to remove or suspend her from the board. Potts resigned Feb. 15, a week before the board received the report. Following an executive session, the DAFC board voted unanimousl­y Feb. 22 to send the report to law enforcemen­t.

The findings are the latest scandal for an agency that was rocked last year following an investigat­ion by The Atlanta Journal-constituti­on and Channel 2 Action News that uncovered a culture of loose financial oversight under former authority leadership.

The Waterford Logistics venture — a cryptocurr­ency mining operation — never made it before the DAFC board for considerat­ion, according to the report, and it appears no public funds or services went to the proposed bitcoin farm. DAFC learned of allega

tions against Potts in October and hired an outside law firm, Andersen Tate & Carr, to investigat­e.

The businesswo­man, Judith Richards, who owns Waterford Logistics, denied to the AJC that she was involved in a pay-to-play scheme, but instead said she is the victim of a fraud.

Richards said she thought she could do business with Potts independen­t of her DAFC service. Richards claims Potts injected her role at DAFC in their work.

“I cannot imagine that your project will be ready for DAFC any sooner than a very fair estimate of 90 days,” Potts told Richards in an August text message. “… After that I imagine your funding will be available after the first of the year.”

Richards said she thought the gifts and benefits given to Potts were permissibl­e so long as the business relationsh­ip was disclosed by Potts to the DAFC board. That disclosure never happened. “What we were expecting was

that Joanna was going to help Waterford Logistics put together … basically a full business plan, a whole package, to bring forth to the developmen­t authority so they could review it and see if we qualified for bond financing,” Richards said.

Richards also alleges she was induced by Potts to pay an associate, a man identified as Charles Aiken of Houston, Texas, $75,000 in bitcoin for consulting work and help to obtain financing that never materializ­ed.

But Richards said she learned in September through DAFC records her bitcoin project did not go before the board for considerat­ion.

Richards said she is out $100,000 and wants to be repaid by DAFC, but legal experts said the authority likely has no liability in this dispute.

Potts did not respond to email messages left for her since Friday. Attempts to contact Aiken were not successful.

Richardsan­d an associate, Dominique Huff, in October filed and later retracted ethics complaints against Potts, which triggered the DAFC investigat­ion.

Potts denied any wrongdoing to DAFC’S lawyers. In a statement included in the report, Potts called Richards’ allegation­s “slanderous.”

According to the report, Potts said the compensati­on she received was for work she did for Waterford Logistics.

Potts said Waterford did not formally apply for assistance from DAFC and she wasn’t required to disclose the business relationsh­ip. If Richards or the company had sought assistance from DAFC, she would have disclosed her business relationsh­ip to the authority and recused herself from any votes as required under DAFC’S ethics guidelines.

Potts was appointed by Commission­er Khadijah Abdur-rahaman last year and joined DAFC on June 1, the same day the AJC published its first story about questionab­le per diems paid to former board Chairman Bob Shaw and two other officers. Potts was among a group of board members who called for a forensic audit of the agency in one of her first appearance­s as a director.

In a statement, Abdur-rahman erroneousl­y said the law firm’s report concluded no illegal activity by Potts.

“Quite frankly, ‘there is nothing to see here,’” Abdur-rahman said.

William Perry, who leads Georgia Ethics Watchdogs, said the conduct outlined by the firm’s report defies belief.

“This is just shocking,” he said. DAFC Chairman Michel “Marty” Turpeau IV said the authority engaged the outside counsel when it learned of the allegation­s and sent the report to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ office.

“In addition to fully cooperatin­g with the initial investigat­ion, I remain committed to assist with any further inquiries from law enforcemen­t,” Turpeau said.

A spokesman for Willis did not return messages seeking comment.

DAFC’S outside lawyers said they made no determinat­ion in the report whether Potts’ alleged actions amount to criminal conduct, “in part because there is no evidence that she took any official action in her capacity” on the board.

 ?? COURTESY IMAGES ?? An outside law firm hired to investigat­e former board member Joanna Potts states that all parties agree that Potts received $10,068.87 in bitcoin and a $3,400 handbag gift from Judith Richards.
COURTESY IMAGES An outside law firm hired to investigat­e former board member Joanna Potts states that all parties agree that Potts received $10,068.87 in bitcoin and a $3,400 handbag gift from Judith Richards.
 ?? ?? The investigat­ion concluded that Potts violated her obligation­s to the Developmen­t Authority of Fulton County. The report made no conclusion­s regarding whether her actions were illegal.
The investigat­ion concluded that Potts violated her obligation­s to the Developmen­t Authority of Fulton County. The report made no conclusion­s regarding whether her actions were illegal.
 ?? ?? In this email included in the lawyers’ investigat­ion, Potts identifies herself as a member of the Developmen­t Authority board to a third party that she met at a crypto-mining conference in Miami.
In this email included in the lawyers’ investigat­ion, Potts identifies herself as a member of the Developmen­t Authority board to a third party that she met at a crypto-mining conference in Miami.
 ?? ?? Joanna Potts
Joanna Potts

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States