The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Many find compromise to support loved ones while staying opposed.

- By Tricia C. Bruce Tricia C. Bruce is a sociologis­t at the University of Notre Dame. This piece originally appeared in The Conversati­on, a nonprofit news source dedicated to unlocking ideas from academia for the public.

Maxine, a pseudonym for a 58-year-old woman, is among a sizable proportion of Americans who are morally opposed to abortion.

Republican, Christian and a grandmothe­r, Maxine “can’t believe that anybody could honestly say that life doesn’t begin at conception. … That’s the black and whiteness of it, for me: Either it’s life or it’s not.” Abortion is “murder,” she told me.

But Maxine also has driven a friend to a clinic to get an abortion.

As a sociologis­t, I met Maxine in May 2019 while leading a study about how everyday people across the U.S. think and feel about abortion.

Maxine explains that her friend wasn’t perfect and neither were her circumstan­ces, but she was still worthy of help.

The cost and logistics of undergoing an abortion in the U.S. mean that few Americans can obtain one without help. Abortion seekers — more than half of whom already are mothers — commonly look to friends or family for help.

My research, in collaborat­ion with social demographe­r Sarah K. Cowan and colleagues, shows that many Americans may be willing to help a friend or family member get an abortion — including those morally opposed to it.

Personal side of abortion

My research team talked face to face, confidenti­ally, with hundreds of Americans throughout the United States to explore abortion opinions beyond what surveys reveal. Our sample closely mirrors the U.S. population overall.

Data from the 2018 General Social Survey, a nationally representa­tive survey fielded since 1972 by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, revealed that 76% of Americans who were morally opposed to abortion would nonetheles­s give “emotional support” to a friend or family member who decided to have an abortion. Another 43% would help make arrangemen­ts, and 28% would help pay for associated costs. Six percent would help pay for the abortion itself.

Amid the backdrop of legislatio­n in Texas permitting citizens to sue anyone who helps a woman obtain an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, these findings may be noteworthy.

While federal and state courts debate the legal status of abortion, the issue is much more personal for ordinary Americans. Nearly a quarter of U.S. women will obtain an abortion by the age of 45. Three-quarters of the hundreds of Americans my team and I interviewe­d personally knew someone who has had an abortion.

Help despite opposition

Talking confidenti­ally with

morally opposed Americans willing to help a loved one get an abortion helped us understand this seemingly contradict­ory behavior. Our team found three main explanatio­ns during our interviews.

The first was “commiserat­ion:” exercising empathy for imperfect loved ones in an imperfect world. The second “exemption,” carved out a special allowance for only their own loved ones. And a third, “discretion,” considered treating friends and family as capable of making their own moral decisions.

All three approaches enabled Americans otherwise opposed to abortion to maintain their personal values — in this case, keeping their moral opposition to abortion — while also exercising what they believed was an obligation to support a loved one.

One could ask whether this is hypocrisy.

Our research suggests otherwise: that requests for help from friends and family activate multiple and potentiall­y competing values.

Such is the case for Maxine and other Americans who hold simultaneo­usly to their opposition to abortion and to their com

mitment to help a loved one in a time of need. My co-authors and I call this inclinatio­n to offer help that runs counter to another value “discordant benevolenc­e.”

Finding morally opposed Americans among willing “helpers” muddies the line between those who support abortion rights and those who oppose them. It also complicate­s how

many of us may understand the ways that ordinary Americans put their values vis-a-vis abortion into practice in real life.

Among interviewe­es who disclosed to us a personal abortion experience, 10% told us that they, too, were “morally opposed” to abortion. Another 50% said that abortion’s morality “depends.” Asked to clarify, interviewe­es named contingenc­ies such as a person’s reasons, beliefs, risks, abortion history or consent to sex.

Theirown reasons for seeking an abortion varied. Some felt pressured. Some didn’t know quite what to do. One told us, “It’s different when it comes to your body and your future and

your life.” Interviewe­es with personal abortion experience were more likely to say that abortion should be “legal under any circumstan­ces” than to say that they were “not morally opposed” to abortion, consistent with data from the General Social Survey regarding the U.S. population overall.

Americans commonly hedge and offer caveats and exceptions to their legal opinions on abortion. Decades of polling from Gallup show the largest group of Americans to support legality in “certain” circumstan­ces. Our interviews revealed that support varied depending on when in a pregnancy an abortion occurs, health risks, number of abortions or even whether the abortion-seeker is known personally.

Contradict­ions, complexiti­es and guesses, in other words, were common in ordinary Americans’ abortion thinking and correspond­ing behavior in relationsh­ip with others.

Helping at a crossroads

Like so many of the Americans we interviewe­d, Maxine bristled at shorthand labels for abortion positions, such as “pro-life,” as well as at the extremist rhetoric advanced by more radical flanks. “Both sides have a whole viciousnes­s to them, you know?” She cautioned against rendering judgment “until you’ve walked in someone’s shoes.”

Legislatio­n that targets the “helpers,” such as those willing to lend a hand to a friend or family member seeking an abortion, sweeps up a far broader swath of Americans than policymake­rs may anticipate. The threat of a lawsuit may well dampen the degree of benevolenc­e friends and family are willing to extend.

But as for Maxine, alongside many of her morally opposed American counterpar­ts, the willingnes­s to support a loved one might just persist alongside other sincerely held values.

 ?? ALEX BRANDON/AP ?? Data from the General Social Survey revealed 76% of Americans who were morally opposed to abortion would give “emotional support” to a friend or family member who decided to have one. Another 43% would help make arrangemen­ts, 28% would pay associated costs and 6% would pay for the abortion.
ALEX BRANDON/AP Data from the General Social Survey revealed 76% of Americans who were morally opposed to abortion would give “emotional support” to a friend or family member who decided to have one. Another 43% would help make arrangemen­ts, 28% would pay associated costs and 6% would pay for the abortion.
 ?? ?? Tricia C. Bruce
Tricia C. Bruce

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States