The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

In Ukraine, a nuclear plant held hostage

Workers at gunpoint stand between world and nuclear disaster.

- Marc Santora and Andrew E. Kramer

In the winter darkness, tracer rounds from Russian armored vehicles streaked past nuclear reactors and high-tension electrical lines. A fire broke out. Shrapnel sprayed a reactor containmen­t vessel.

In the control room of Reactor No. 3, operators were horrified. “Stop firing at the nuclear facility,” one begged over the station’s loudspeake­rs. “You are endangerin­g the safety of the entire world.”

The danger at the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant — a sprawl of cooling towers, nuclear reactors, machine rooms and radioactiv­e waste storage sites — actually was graver than even those who worked there knew in early March, just days after Russian forces invaded Ukraine.

A large caliber bullet had pierced an outer wall of Reactor No. 4 but, most worrying and not disclosed at the time, an artillery shell had struck an electrical transforme­r at Reactor No. 6, which was filled with flammable cooling oil, plant employees subsequent­ly learned and told The New York Times. Both reactors were active.

“By happy coincidenc­e, it didn’t burn,” said an engineer, Oleksiy, who insisted that his last name not be publicly disclosed out of security concerns.

Five months later, with artillery fire once again striking the plant, the specter of a possible nuclear catastroph­e has gripped the world’s attention. Urgent negotiatio­ns are taking place to try to arrange a visit by experts from the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency.

Officials from the United States, the European Union and the United Nations have called for the creation of a demilitari­zed zone, as Ukraine and Russia accuse each other of preparing attacks on the plant — leading many to fear that Zaporizhzh­ia is in greater peril than ever.

Standing between the world and a nuclear calamity are the Ukrainian workers who know the plant intimately, having run it for years with the utmost precaution in a sleepy corner of southern Ukraine where the city and the plant had once lived in a steady and predictabl­e symbiosis before the Russians arrived.

Today, under Russian occupation, plant employees are both hostages and essential workers — Ukrainian engineers duty bound to prevent disaster while working under the watchful eye of Russian snipers.

The surroundin­g city where they live, Enerhodar, which translates as “the gift of energy,” is under siege. Some 100 plant workers have been detained by Russian forces, according to Ukrainian officials and residents. Ten of those still are missing.

It is up to a skeletal crew of stressed, tired and scared workers to prevent disaster.

“Imagine men and women coming to work and facing armed soldiers all around,” said Serhiy Shvets, a metalworke­r at the plant who was shot by Russian soldiers at his home in May.

They had searched videos of people who protested in the first days of the war and saw his face.

Shvets, 53, managed to get out of the city and to Ukrainian-controlled territory, where he spoke from his hospital bed. He fears for the plant, the city and the world with the Russian military now holed up in the nuclear station.

“They are like a monkey with a grenade, not really understand­ing the threat they are posing,” he said.

The sleeping giant

Two months before the Russian invasion, Enerhodar celebrated an annual holiday unique to a community living in the shadow of Europe’s largest nuclear power plant: “The Day of the Energy Engineer.”

There were dinners, music, dancing and a fireworks display.

“It was enchanting and cool,” said Olha, an engineer who attended the celebratio­ns and fled the city in May, but relayed communicat­ions from those inside.

Like other employees of the plant interviewe­d for this article, Olha would speak only on the condition of anonymity out of fear for her safety.

In a city of 55,000, some 11,000 people worked at the plant. The city’s flag even features a blazing sun in tribute to the energy it provides.

Work on Zaporizhzh­ia began in 1984. When the sixth reactor came online in 1995, four years after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Ukraine’s independen­ce, Ukrainians celebrated Zaporizhzh­ia as an accomplish­ment.

It became, both, a source of pride and a symbol of Ukrainian perseveran­ce in the impoverish­ed, early post-Soviet years and the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, which occurred when a safety test simulating the effects of a power failure ended in what many considered to be the world’s worst nuclear disaster.

After Chernobyl, and after Ukraine’s independen­ce, authoritie­s issued a brief moratorium on nuclear constructi­on, but it was not long before the country forged ahead with its nuclear ambitions. Today, Ukraine is second only to France in relying on its reactor network to meet its electricit­y needs.

A unique achievemen­t, the Zaporizhzh­ia site also has unique vulnerabil­ities.

The massive plant was conceived in the Soviet industrial design philosophy known as Gigantism, giving birth to a panorama of industrial prowess, where much of what would seem to be the plant’s inner workings are exposed, rendering it especially vulnerable to the conflict now raging around it.

From the opposite shore of the Kakhovka reservoir, the cooling towers, smokestack­s and containmen­t vessels appeared through a haze on a recent summer afternoon, contrastin­g with the gentle valley of sunflower and wheat fields and rolling hills along the Dnieper River.

Zaporizhzh­ia has its own radioactiv­e waste storage system, which was establishe­d in 1999 with Western backing as a way to end reliance on Russian reprocessi­ng of spent fuel.

That storage site poses an especially disastrous risk today.

Each “block,” or reactor and machine room complex, required about 600 employees, he said. They worked in three eight-hour shifts that rotated from morning to evening to overnight, usually scheduled months in advance.

The culture was one of vigilance and attention to detail, he said. Even minor accidents meticulous­ly were documented.

Like a sleeping giant, the plant and its perilous reactors were kept free of all disturbanc­es.

But the plant’s occupation by armed Russian forces while fighting rages outside is not an emergency they had anticipate­d.

A descent into chaos and fear

Gortenko was there that March night when the Russians stormed the plant. When the shooting was over, he arrived to find half the windows in his building shattered from shrapnel and gunfire.

An icy wind blew through the offices.

Workers taped plastic over the broken panes and resumed their duties. Russian soldiers, he said, appeared from time to time. At first, he did not see them threatenin­g workers, but they were armed.

By spring, however, the employees were entering the plant under the watchful eye of Russian snipers, according to messages shared with The Times.

“Russian snipers take positions on the roofs of the station’s buildings,” was the message sent to Olha, the engineer. “The employees are literally working at gunpoint.”

An estimated 500 Russian soldiers are at the plant, according to witnesses and a Western official. They are believed to be members of the Rosgvardiy­a, according to the senior Western official, who have a reputation for brutality.

Harried, fearful for their families, employees at the nuclear plant nonetheles­s turned up for work in the reactor control rooms, pumping stations and turbine compartmen­ts.

As the Russians tightened their grip on the plant and the city, officials at Energoatom, the Ukrainian company that oversees the nation’s 15 nuclear reactors, made a decision to allow some nonessenti­al staff to leave.

In April, the company also decided to distribute its entire stockpile of potassium iodide, a drug that can protect people from radiation-induced thyroid cancer.

Ukrainian authoritie­s also are revising evacuation plans for about 400,000 people living in Ukrainian-controlled territory that most likely would be in the radiation fallout zone in the event of a meltdown.

Combat has returned to the plant again, with artillery shells striking the station grounds. Explosions are heard frequently, employees said.

On Monday, Ukrainian officials said there had been shelling again near the plant and that a man had been killed and several others injured when Russian soldiers opened fire on their car at close range.

The violence has set off a desperate exodus of those living there, and on whom the peaceful functionin­g of the plant depends.

“Many of those who are still working would like to leave, as well,” Olha said.

 ?? DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/NEW YORK TIMES ?? The Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant, across the Dnipro River, in Ukraine, is where an artillery shell in March had struck an electrical transforme­r at Reactor No. 6, which was filled with flammable cooling oil. Five months later, artillery fire is again striking near the plant.
DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/NEW YORK TIMES The Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant, across the Dnipro River, in Ukraine, is where an artillery shell in March had struck an electrical transforme­r at Reactor No. 6, which was filled with flammable cooling oil. Five months later, artillery fire is again striking near the plant.
 ?? DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/NEW YORK TIMES ?? Ukrainian emergency rescue teams practice a nuclear disaster in Zaporizhzh­ia on Aug. 17. Standing between the world and a nuclear calamity are the Ukrainian workers who intimately know the plant.
DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/NEW YORK TIMES Ukrainian emergency rescue teams practice a nuclear disaster in Zaporizhzh­ia on Aug. 17. Standing between the world and a nuclear calamity are the Ukrainian workers who intimately know the plant.
 ?? LYNSEY ADDARIO/NEW YORK TIMES ?? Olha, an engineer at the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant, said the plant’s employees “are literally working at gunpoint.”
LYNSEY ADDARIO/NEW YORK TIMES Olha, an engineer at the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant, said the plant’s employees “are literally working at gunpoint.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States