The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Sterigenic­s wins mixed ruling in lawsuit against Cobb

Judge rules county’s bid to alter permit used insufficie­nt reasons.

- By Meris Lutz meris.lutz@ajc.com

A controvers­ial medical sterilizer may continue operating near Smyrna following a judge’s ruling that sided with some of the company’s claims but still left the door open to stricter regulation.

Sterigenic­s, the country’s largest medical sterilizat­ion company, has been at the center of a heated public debate over whether its business practices put local communitie­s at increased risk of cancer. The company uses ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing gas, to sterilize medical equipment and other items.

In 2020, Sterigenic­s filed a lawsuit against Cobb County officials who sought to require its local facility to obtain a new occupancy permit based on a higher standard for heavy industry.

Sterigenic­s’ complaint argued that county officials were looking for an excuse to shut down the plant to appease public outrage following media coverage of a federal report on increased cancer risk in surroundin­g neighborho­ods. The facility has been operating under a temporary court order as the case moved forward.

Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Sarah E. Geraghty ruled Cobb’s decision to require the new permit on the grounds Sterigenic­s had undertaken “substantia­l” renovation­s to install new pollution controls was not valid based on the limited scope of the work.

Ultimately, however, Geraghty allowed that the county could assert a requiremen­t for a new permit under other conditions. In this hypothetic­al scenario, any potential damage to Sterigenic­s is unknown, she said.

“Discussion­s over what facility changes would be required for the issuance of a new (certificat­e of occupancy) were cut off by the start of this litigation, with the question left unanswered,” she wrote. “(D)espite what Sterigenic­s suggests was (county officials’) aim to shut down the facility permanentl­y, the court is not free to assume that this is what would ultimately occur.”

Geraghty also found no indication that the county or its officials “acted other than in good faith and in keeping with their profession­al responsibi­lities,” but added that this was irrelevant to her decision.

Cobb County Commission Chair Lisa Cupid said in a statement that the county attorney was still evaluating the court’s comprehens­ive ruling.

“I recognize the order will allow the facility to continue operating,” Cupid said. “The order makes it clear that the county will still have the opportunit­y to monitor the facility and ensure it operates in the interest of public safety.”

Sterigenic­s did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

Jen Jordan, an attorney and former state senator who used to represent and live in the affected area, said her reading of the decision was that it was a very narrow ruling intended to get the case out of federal court.

“The most important thing is to keep the people of Cobb County safe,” Jordan said. “The county shouldn’t back down; they just need to make sure that what they do is on strong legal grounds, and I think that there are strong legal grounds out there.”

Separately, Sterigenic­s faces legal action from Georgia residents who accuse the company of exposing them to dangerous levels of ethylene oxide. Earlier this year, the company agreed to pay more than $400 million to settle lawsuits brought by Illinois residents living near its Willowbroo­k facility. The company has denied wrongdoing and said its decision to settle was a financial one.

 ?? HYOSUB SHIN/AJC 2020 ?? The Sterigenic­s plant (foreground) in Smyrna has continued to operate with its existing permit in place pending a ruling on Cobb County’s effort to require a more stringent permit.
HYOSUB SHIN/AJC 2020 The Sterigenic­s plant (foreground) in Smyrna has continued to operate with its existing permit in place pending a ruling on Cobb County’s effort to require a more stringent permit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States