The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

With GOP, Baltimore rebuild no sure thing

- Paul Krugman He writes for The New York Times

Soon after a huge container ship struck Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, bringing it down, President Joe Biden pledged that the federal government would “pay the entire cost of reconstruc­ting” the bridge. This would clearly be the right thing to do, not just to help the state of Maryland but also to limit the economic damage from a disaster that has blocked both a major road artery and a major port. Among other things, the Port of Baltimore plays a key role in both exports of coal and trade in farm and constructi­on equipment, so the bridge disaster will have direct adverse effects on the heartland as well as the East Coast.

And if America were still the same country that enacted the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 — passed with overwhelmi­ng support in Congress and signed into law by a Republican president — which gave rise to our Interstate System, there would be little question that Congress would approve funding soon after it returns.

But we aren’t that country anymore. Biden will probably be able to get funds for rebuilding, but it’s by no means a sure thing.

The rise of MAGA Republican­s is only part of the problem. I’ve seen several people citing the response to the 2007 collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge in Minnesota as an example of what things were like in a better political era. Indeed, within days, Congress voted unanimousl­y to provide $250 million in aid.

But that was a one-off. The Minnesota bridge collapse highlighte­d the decaying state of America’s infrastruc­ture, and one might have expected the disaster to lead to real action, but it didn’t. President Barack Obama pleaded with Congress to approve broad increases in infrastruc­ture spending and was able to sign a highway funding bill in 2015, but for the most part he was stymied. As president, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to revamp America’s infrastruc­ture — “it’s infrastruc­ture week” became a running joke — but never delivered.

Major action on infrastruc­ture didn’t happen until late 2021 with the enactment of the Bipartisan Infrastruc­ture Law — which, despite the name, received only 13 Republican votes in the House. And that was with Democrats in full control of Congress. It’s not foolish to worry that MAGA hard-liners will block aid to Maryland in much the same way that they’ve blocked aid to Ukraine.

But again, MAGA is only part of the problem. Let’s talk for a minute about why it took 14 years after the Minnesota bridge collapse for us to finally take major action on infrastruc­ture.

Extreme partisansh­ip, which took hold long before Trump took control of the GOP, is part of the answer. There was also an element of reflexive opposition to government spending in general, no matter how obvious the need. Mitch McConnell, as Senate majority leader, didn’t do much to oppose Trump — but he did put the brakes on infrastruc­ture spending.

The history here is reason enough to worry about rebuilding in Baltimore, even if the bridge collapse hadn’t been caught up in culture war politics. But of course it has.

MAGA politician­s and media figures wasted no time after the bridge collapse trying to cast blame on the usual suspects, including funds meant to be spent on green energy and, in particular, diversity initiative­s: In the immediate wake of the Key Bridge collapse, a Republican state legislator from Utah replied to a post on X, formerly Twitter, disparagin­g a member of the Maryland Port Commission, writing, “This is what happens when you have Governors who prioritize diversity over the wellbeing and security of citizens.”

So will partisansh­ip and conspiracy theorizing get in the way of rebuilding the Key Bridge? I’d like to dismiss that risk. But this is no time to be complacent.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States