The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Judge rules in favor of Georgia voter citizenshi­p requiremen­ts

Directed verdict issued after plaintiffs rested their case.

- By Mark Niesse Mark.Niesse@ajc.com

A federal judge upheld Georgia’s citizenshi­p verificati­on requiremen­ts for new Americans, dismissing the case midway through the trial Thursday after three days of testimony.

U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross granted a directed verdict in court, finding that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the voting rights of naturalize­d citizens are violated when they have to show papers or get a new state ID before they can vote.

The quick ruling brings an abrupt end to a lawsuit that has been pending since 2018 over state laws that prevent new citizens from casting ballots until they show that they’re eligible.

Attorneys for Georgia said in court this week that citizenshi­p checks are needed to prevent the possibilit­y of illegal voting. Zero noncitizen­s have voted in recent elections, according to a 2022 audit by the secretary of state’s office.

“Ensuring that only U.S. citizens vote in our elections is critically important to secure and accurate elections,” said Secretary of State Brad Raffensper­ger, the defendant in the case. “Georgia’s citizenshi­p verificati­on process is common sense, and it works. With this ruling, we are able to continue ensuring that only U.S. citizens are voting in our elections.”

An attorney for the voting rights groups that had sued said voters should ensure their registrati­ons are active and valid.

“We’re very disappoint­ed in the outcome of the trial,” said Julie Houk, an attorney for the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which represente­d plaintiffs including the Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda. “We encourage anyone who ... hasn’t had an opportunit­y to be put in active status on the voter rolls to immediatel­y take steps to change that” by contacting their county elections office.

During this week’s trial, witnesses included three voters who said they had to jump through hoops before they were allowed to vote.

But the defense showed that all of those voters were eventually able to vote after they overcame hurdles to registerin­g with county election officials who didn’t properly process citizenshi­p paperwork.

Ross, an appointee of President Barack Obama, found Georgia’s elections are open to all citizens and that the state has an interest in ensuring that only citizens are allowed to vote.

All Georgia voters must show ID before they can cast a ballot in each election.

The voting rights groups that sued had asked Ross to order election officials to stop labeling new citizens as “pending” voters until they showed documentat­ion, instead making them active voters automatica­lly.

Ross rejected that proposal, issuing her ruling after the plaintiffs rested their case and before the defense presented a single witness.

One witness for the plaintiffs, Tamieka Atkins of the voting rights group ProGeorgia, testified that new Georgians shouldn’t have to go through extra steps to prove themselves before they can participat­e in democracy.

“Recently naturalize­d citizens shouldn’t be treated differentl­y from natural-born U.S. citizens,” Atkins testified Monday. “The burden shouldn’t be on newly naturalize­d citizens.”

New citizens must either provide naturaliza­tion documents with their voter registrati­on applicatio­n, send papers to election offices, show citizenshi­p informatio­n when they vote or present proof within three days of an election.

They can also pay $32 to update their driver’s licenses to reflect that they have become U.S. citizens and then re-register to vote.

The plaintiffs argued that Georgia’s citizenshi­p verificati­on process violated protection­s against discrimina­tion in the U.S. Constituti­on, the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registrati­on Act.

There’s no government system that automatica­lly informs election officials when a Georgia resident earns citizenshi­p.

The secretary of state’s office has previously said it would routinely verify voters’ citizenshi­p status by the end of last year, but that system still hasn’t been put in place.

The ruling is the latest decision upholding Georgia’s voting laws in recent years, but it’s the first ruling that came in the middle of a trial.

U.S. District Judge Steve Jones ruled against Fair Fight, the voting group that Democrat Stacey Abrams founded, in its 2018 lawsuit that opposed Georgia’s voting laws. Jones also upheld a Republican redistrict­ing plan in December. A different judge hasn’t yet issued a decision after an election security trial in January.

The first trial over Georgia’s 2021 voting law is scheduled to begin Monday, dealing with a provision of the law that restricts nonprofit organizati­ons from mass mailing absentee ballot applicatio­ns to voters.

 ?? ?? U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross
U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States