The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Dispute over animal control payment drags on

Fulton still won’t provide services to city of Atlanta.

- By Jim Gaines james.gaines@coxinc.com

Fulton County won’t resume providing animal control services to the city of Atlanta without a signed intergover­nmental agreement, county commission­ers declared Wednesday while also disputing the city’s claim the county owes $5.7 million to the city for old water bills.

That claim, brought up by city officials during negotiatio­ns on a new animal control agreement, amounts to a “smokescree­n,” Commission­er Bob Ellis said.

A spokespers­on for Mayor Andre Dickens issued a brief response Thursday that did not address the issues brought up by county officials.

“The city continues to encourage residents to call 311 for animal services in the absence of Fulton County providing services, and call 911 for emergency situations,” he said.

Discussion of those issues didn’t pass without a shouting match between Commission­ers Marvin Arrington Jr. and Khadijah Abdur-Rahman. Arrington, who sought to immediatel­y restore animal control services to Atlanta, said the county had received a signed letter of intent from the city, which “is in fact a contract.”

Abdur-Rahman said something during Arrington’s speech.

“Shut up! Shut up! I’m talking,” Arrington shouted repeatedly.

“Make me!” Abdur-Rahman called back.

Soon afterward, Arrington walked out.

Commission Chair Robb Pitts asked County Attorney Y. Soo Jo for an opinion on the city’s letter of intent.

“A letter of intent is a promise to enter into a promise. It is not legally binding,” she said.

Commission­ers AbdurRahma­n, Ellis and Bridget Thorne also left. The meeting ended moments later.

Pitts announced April 5 the county was cutting off animal control services to Atlanta in the absence of an intergover­nmental agreement, including the city’s willingnes­s to pay a higher annual rate for that service.

A lengthy back-and-forth with Atlanta officials failed to produce a signed agreement, he said. Even now, it would take city council until Monday to approve it as a resolution, or until May 6 if it has to be passed as an ordinance, Pitts said.

Thorne said the city could hold a special meeting sooner if council members wanted. In negotiatio­ns, city officials said they didn’t want to pay for services the county already provided from Jan. 1 to April 5, she said.

Since the April 5 service cutoff, Atlanta residents brought about 40 dogs to the county shelter, according to Joe Barasoane, director of emergency management, which oversees animal services. They weren’t turned away because staff knew the dogs would be “tied up on the fence line outside the shelter” if not taken in, he said.

Animal control has received many calls from Atlanta residents requesting service but has been redirectin­g them to 311, Barasoane said.

Although the county built a new $40 million animal shelter last year, that constructi­on cost is not being passed along to cities, county officials have said. But the shelter’s operating costs are higher due to greater services and more staff. Animal control charges to each city are calculated based on how many service calls come in from each city, according to county staff.

Atlanta is asked to pay the most — $6.8 million — for services because it accounts for about 55% of calls. Atlanta, East Point, South Fulton and Union City bear 86% of animal control costs, but that’s because they account for the bulk of service calls, Pitts said.

Charges for animal control have not risen in about five years even though costs have increased steadily, with the county and its nonprofit contractor LifeLine absorbing that increase until this year, Pitts has said.

Commission­er Dana Barrett said cities were told last July their animal control charges would go up sharply. The formal intergover­nmental agreements went out in October, and all 14 other cities in Fulton County signed. Any argument on how those charges are apportione­d should have been made then, Barrett said.

Atlanta was warned by a commission vote March 20 that service would be cut off April 3 without a new agreement, Barrett said.

She read off the state constituti­on, which says counties cannot provide animal control within a city’s boundaries without a contract.

“What message are we sending mayors of the other cities that did the right thing?” Abdur-Rahman said. She’s a proud lifelong Atlantan, but providing animal services without a contract creates legal liability for the county, she said.

On the city’s claim that the county owes millions for old water bills, Pitts said he talked several times with Dickens last week, and told him the county will pay any bill it really owes — but he asked for documentat­ion.

“What we received from the city of Atlanta was a one-page spreadshee­t,” Pitts said.

County staff said the city’s claim dates back more than 40 years and previous discussion­s were inconclusi­ve. Fulton County Chief Financial Officer Sharon Whitmore said her office is trying to reconcile all old bills and seeks to meet with the city and utility.

Answering Barrett, Whitmore said the last time the city brought it up was in 2019 — when it again fell silent when asked to provide details.

Pitts said he wants to get the water bill claim resolved “in the next couple of weeks.”

Arrington said that according to state law, bills more than four years old are invalid. Pitts asked the county attorney to check.

“If that applies, we may have nothing to talk about,” he said.

 ?? OLIVIA BOWDOIN FOR THE AJC ?? The new Fulton County Animal Services building opened in December. Officials were told last year that animal control charges would be rising sharply, and 14 of 15 cities — all but Atlanta — signed agreements.
OLIVIA BOWDOIN FOR THE AJC The new Fulton County Animal Services building opened in December. Officials were told last year that animal control charges would be rising sharply, and 14 of 15 cities — all but Atlanta — signed agreements.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States