The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

With streaming, subscriber­s can be fickle

Our new TV habit: Sign up. Watch. Cancel. Repeat.

- By John Koblin c. 2024 The New York Times

Early last year, Josh Meisel and his wife wanted to watch a new buzzy Peacock drama, “Poker Face,” starring Natasha Lyonne.

But Meisel, a scientist who lives outside Boston, did not subscribe to Peacock. He paid for half a dozen other streaming services and was reluctant to sign up for another. So he and his wife made a pact. If they weren’t watching “Poker Face” anymore after two weeks, they would cancel Peacock.

Sure enough, they lost interest and canceled. And then he realized: Why stop there?

In the weeks that followed, Meisel, who is 39, cut loose Max, Apple TV+ and Hulu. He eventually resubscrib­ed to Hulu and Apple TV+ when there were shows the couple wanted to watch — Hulu for “The Bear,” Apple TV+ for “Slow Horses” — but canceled both again after they finished watching a new season.

And he is hardly alone. Americans are getting increasing­ly impulsive about hitting the cancellati­on button on their streaming services. More than 29 million — about one-quarter of domestic paying streaming subscriber­s — have canceled three or more services over the last two years, according to Antenna, a subscripti­on research firm. And the numbers are rising fast.

The data suggests a sharp shift in consumer behavior — far from the cable era, when viewers largely stuck with a single provider, as well as the early days of the so-called streaming wars, when people kept adding services without culling or jumping around.

Among these nomadic subscriber­s, some are taking advantage of how easy it is, with a monthly contract and simple click of a button, to hopscotch from one service to the next. Indeed, these users can be fickle; one-third of them resubscrib­e to the canceled service within six months, according to Antenna’s research.

“In three years, this went

from a very niche behavior to an absolute mainstream part of the market,” said Jonathan Carson, the CEO of Antenna.

Trying to navigate new viewer habits

The change gives consumers far more flexibilit­y, but the implicatio­ns could be significan­t for the major media companies, especially if this behavior becomes even more common.

Traditiona­l media companies like Paramount, Warner Bros. Discovery, NBCUnivers­al and Disney are trying to navigate the extremely bumpy road from the cable bundle (which was enormously profitable) to streaming (which is not). NBCUnivers­al’s Peacock, for one, lost $2.8 billion last year.

As a result, the companies slashed investment­s in shows — the number of scripted shows in the United States in 2023 suffered its steepest decline in at least 15 years — and are raising prices to their streaming services. (Disney+ and Hulu both raised the price of their commercial-free tiers by $3 a month last year, for instance.)

Less loyal subscriber­s could introduce a whole new level of complexity to their business. Last year, these “serial churners,” as Antenna calls them, accounted for roughly 40% of all new subscripti­ons and cancellati­ons, Carson said.

The companies “clearly

can’t ignore them because it’s such a big, active part of the market,” he said.

One option for slowing the churn, executives think, is to bring back some element of the cable bundle by selling streaming services together. Executives believe consumers would be less inclined to cancel a package that offered services from multiple companies.

Disney has found success by bundling Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ into one package. It also joined several other companies, including Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery, in announcing a sports streaming service scheduled to start this fall.

The services are also trying to keep subscriber­s hooked with “coming soon” features prominentl­y displayed in their apps. Disney+ recently advertised a coming documentar­y series from National Geographic (“Secrets of the Octopus”), and Apple TV+ is teasing “Dark Matter,” a science-fiction series that comes out in May in its app.

This year, when Peacock was days away from showing the first streaming-only NFL playoff game, it promoted a special offer to deter new subscriber­s from canceling: Sign up for a full year at $30, half the normal price. (And according to Antenna’s research, people who signed up for Peacock on the weekend of the game did not cancel en masse the next month; the cancellati­on

rates were close to average.)

Although the nomadic subscriber­s tend to skew slightly younger and have a slightly lower income, “this is an activity that all types of Americans are engaging in,” Carson said.

It’s subscripti­on overload for some

Kailyn Castro, a 32-yearold who works at a tech company and lives in New York City, started piling up streaming subscripti­ons during the pandemic. She had lots of downtime, she said, and kept “hearing about what everybody else was watching, and I wanted to be able to watch those things as well.”

But over the last year or so, as the pandemic faded, Castro found herself back to a busy social and profession­al life and began cutting most of them.

“I feel like the world was really back last year,” she said. “People were just outside more, interactin­g with humans more.”

Viewers sensitive to price increases

Price sensitivit­y is a factor. Americans with a streaming subscripti­on are spending an average of $61 a month for four services, an increase from $48 a year ago, according to a new study by Deloitte. The increase was due to higher prices, not additional services. Nearly half the people surveyed said they would cancel their favorite streaming service if monthly prices went up another $5, the study said.

Alicia Bianchi, a 38-year old lawyer in Michigan, said she had been culling streamers over the last year, including Hulu, Paramount and Peacock, and would probably let go of Max once she was finished watching “The Regime,” the Kate Winslet HBO limited series that premiered last month. She said she was being “very mindful of spending,” more so than she was a few years ago.

“I’m able to turn them off so easily now, it’s like, why spend the money on something that I’m not using?” she said.

Bianchi, who has two young children, will not cancel Netflix, however.

“I don’t ever mess with my Netflix subscripti­on,” she said. Netflix’s cancellati­on rate is much lower than those of its peers, according to Antenna.

Likewise, Meisel, the scientist who canceled several streaming services after giving up on “Poker Face,” said the Netflix subscripti­on — as well as Amazon Prime and Disney+ — was off-limits.

He’s otherwise enjoying his newfound flexibilit­y around the other services. After canceling Peacock, he brought it back for a short period.

Now, with a pared-down streaming subscripti­on list, there’s a weight off his shoulders, Meisel said.

“I don’t like this new system where you have to have a million different subscripti­ons to watch what you want to watch,” he said. “I’m happy to cancel to punish the companies who are making me do this.”

 ?? OSCAR NIMMO/NEW YORK TIMES ?? Many more people are jumping from one streaming subscripti­on to another, a behavior that could have big implicatio­ns for the entertainm­ent industry.
OSCAR NIMMO/NEW YORK TIMES Many more people are jumping from one streaming subscripti­on to another, a behavior that could have big implicatio­ns for the entertainm­ent industry.
 ?? CHRIS DELMAS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES/TNS ?? Disney has found success bundling Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ into one package. It also joined several other companies for a sports streaming service.
CHRIS DELMAS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES/TNS Disney has found success bundling Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ into one package. It also joined several other companies for a sports streaming service.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States