The Bakersfield Californian

Experts: New virus numbers likely erratic

- BY DANIELLA PETERS

MILWAUKEE — The coronaviru­s testing numbers that have guided much of the nation’s response to the pandemic are likely to be erratic over the next week or so, experts said Friday, as fewer people get tested during the Thanksgivi­ng holiday weekend and testing sites observe shorter hours.

The result could be potential dips in reported infections that offer the illusion that the spread of the virus is easing when, in fact, the numbers say little about where the nation stands in fighting COVID-19. The number of Americans who have tested positive passed 13 million Friday, according to Johns Hopkins University.

“I just hope that people don’t misinterpr­et the numbers and think that there wasn’t a major surge as a result of Thanksgivi­ng, and then end up making Christmas and Hanukkah and other travel plans,” said Dr. Leana Wen, a professor at George Washington University and an emergency physician.

A similar pattern unfolds on many weekends. Because some testing centers, labs and state offices are closed on Saturdays and Sundays, COVID case numbers often drop each Sunday and Monday, only to peak on Tuesday.

Dr. Mark Rupp, professor and chief of infectious diseases at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, said the effect of Thanksgivi­ng is likely to be a magnified version of the weekend figures. The Thursday holiday will exacerbate the record-keeping discrepanc­ies over the long weekend, artificial­ly depressing the reported numbers for four or five days before spiking as test results catch up.

Johns Hopkins University reported a high of more than 2 million tests a few days before Thanksgivi­ng as people prepared to travel, but that number had dropped to less than 1.2 million tests on Thanksgivi­ng Day. The latter number, as well as positive case numbers, which had dropped by about a third Friday, could be adjusted as more results are returned.

In several state and cities, officials reported sharp drops in testing Friday and reminded people not to read improvemen­ts into them. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said the drop means that

residents might not know for weeks how much their efforts to slow the spread affected the state’s rate of positive tests.

While testing was down Thursday and Friday, health officials said they anecdotall­y saw a jump in people getting tested before deciding to travel or gather for Thanksgivi­ng meals. They warned that the tests are often a snapshot, not a complete assurance that someone has not been exposed to the virus.

“I think it can be kind of a false sense of security for some people,” Rupp said, predicting that the holiday will be followed within weeks by another surge “because people have continued to travel, they’ve continued to have gatherings outside their immediate family.”

Experts worry how people might interpret the situation after the long weekend, especially if it takes a few weeks for Thanksgivi­ng exposures to show up in testing data.

Cities and states generally use hospitaliz­ation and intensive care numbers, which lag behind virus case reporting, to determine when to increase or ease public health restrictio­ns and recommenda­tions. But the public is more likely to look at testing numbers or case counts, which might be misleading, Wen said, and waiting until hospitals are overwhelme­d is risky.

“Where we are now is a completely unsustaina­ble place. I think it’s extremely frustratin­g to those of us in health care to see our calls are not being heeded,” Wen said. “And the level of alarm that we have is not reflected in individual­s’ behavior.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States