Calif. leaders vow to protect abortion
SACRAMENTO — Already home to some of the most expansive abortion protections in the country, California lawmakers vowed to go further on Tuesday by becoming one of the first to guarantee a right to an abortion in a state constitution.
California already uses taxpayer money to pay for some abortions through its Medicaid program. And it requires private insurance companies to cover abortions while stopping them from charging things like copays and deductibles for the procedure.
Those protections won’t go away anytime soon as Democrats are in firm control of the governor’s office and the state Legislature. But nationally, federal abortion protections could soon vanish. A leaked draft of a potential ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court, published by Politico, revealed a majority of justices on the court would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that stopped states from banning all abortions.
If that happens, at least 26 states are likely to outlaw abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights advocacy group. While California won’t be one of them, the possibility has prompted Democrats to double down on their pledge to make the state an abortion sanctuary.
The constitutional amendment, which has yet to be introduced in the Legislature, would make it much harder to repeal California’s abortion protections should the political winds change and future lawmakers seek to impose restrictions. Democrats also believe it would shield the state from any adverse state court decisions or federal abortion bans that could happen if Republicans were to take control of Congress after the midterm elections this fall.
“We’ve always had the right to protect our constituents more than the federal government. That is the foundation of the American system,” said Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, an attorney and chair of the Assembly Select Committee on Reproductive Health.
Republicans were mostly quiet about the proposed amendment on Tuesday. After Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeted that “our daughters, sisters, mothers, and grandmothers will not be silenced,” Republican state Sen. Melissa Melendez replied that Newsom “doesn’t understand that aborting would-be daughters, sisters, mothers and grandmothers silences them before they ever have a chance to speak a word.”
“The amendment itself that is being proposed is largely redundant virtue signaling,” said Jonathan Keller, president and CEO of the California Family Council, an anti-abortion group.
David A. Carrillo, executive director of Berkeley Law’s California Constitution Center, said states like California “can use their constitutions to increase protections for reproductive liberty.” He said the next battles could come between Congress and the states if the federal government tries to enact a nationwide ban on abortion.
“But it’s hard to see such federal legislation surviving,” he said, given that the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the draft ruling from the court “leave abortion regulation to the states.”
Newsom’s office said its goal is to put the amendment on the ballot this November, though lawmakers will have to act quickly to make that happen. They have to vote on it before the end of June to give state officials enough time to print the ballots.