The Bakersfield Californian

Does Target believe in LGBTQ rights or not?

- LETICIA MIRANDA Leticia Miranda is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering consumer goods and the retail industry. She was previously a business reporter at NBC News and a retail reporter at BuzzFeed News.

Target has been rolling out a new Pride Month collection for several years. The annual limited-time collection has been criticized in the past for pandering to LGBTQ shoppers with cheesy and tacky apparel such as a polyester rainbow short suit or a tank top with an image of drag star Rupaul. But this year’s collection has been greeted with a more violent backlash among right-wing commenters online, underscori­ng how there’s no such thing as a humdrum annual marketing event at a time when gender-affirming teachers, doctors and other people are being pushed undergroun­d by the antitrans wave sweeping parts of the country.

What Target has that these doctors and teachers don’t is a whole corporate infrastruc­ture to withstand the political furor over its Pride collection. That’s if it accepts that there is no middle-ground to play anymore.

Just weeks after launching its Pride collection this year, Target announced Wednesday that it is removing certain items altogether and moving the remaining merchandis­e to the back in some Southern stores because of “threats impacting our team members’ sense of safety and well-being while at work.” The collection this year includes a series of T-shirts with LGBTQ-related images like a rainbow-colored brain with the words “Sorry, can’t think straight” and home decor such as a pillow designed by independen­t LGBTQ artists among other items.

The item provoking the most transphobi­c backlash online is the collection’s “tuck friendly” women’s swimsuits that allow trans women, who have not had gender-affirming surgery, to conceal their genitalia. Some people online have proffered misleading claims that the tuck-friendly bathing suit is sold for children. It is not.

Some have also lashed out at the retailer’s partnershi­p with the U.K.-based brand Abprallen, which they claim sells Satanic merchandis­e on its company website. Abprallen’s pieces in the Target collection include an image of a snake with the line, “Cure transphobi­a, not trans people.” A search on Target’s website on Wednesday didn’t bring up the bathing suit, though Reuters reported that only the Abprallen merchandis­e had been removed while other pieces are under review.

It’s easy to see how these items would light up transphobi­c conversati­ons. We’re living in a country where conservati­ves have pushed through or proposed dozens of laws at the state level that force the use of certain bathrooms, restrict discussion­s of issues like sexual orientatio­n and gender identity in schools, and outlaw gender-affirming healthcare for minors. What’s been exposed is a fundamenta­l disagreeme­nt about whether transgende­r and queer people deserve humanity, and at what age they can be acknowledg­ed to exist and access healthcare.

Respecting clothing choices that give the community dignity and pride is a small piece of a nastier battle. In the wake of anti-trans laws, some doctors who offer gender-affirming healthcare have received death threats and regularly check whether or not they have been doxxed online. One school received bomb threats after Fox News articles targeted a teacher that it said posted on TikTok about the classroom’s queer library.

Amid this type of violence, there is no middle ground. It calls for a whole new corporate playbook. Take the recent backlash against Anheuser-Busch, which promoted its Bud Light beer with transgende­r influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Conservati­ves vowed to boycott the company while LGBTQ consumers called on Anheuser-Busch to take a stand against the transphobi­a behind the outcry. Instead, the company tweeted a six paragraph statement that neither condemned the transphobi­c backlash nor apologized for partnering with Mulvaney. It played the middle and lost sales.

While the controvers­y is still fresh, Target has an opportunit­y to use its infrastruc­ture to push back on misinforma­tion about its products, and protect its workers and Pride collection shoppers with extra security. It has a large and loyal customer base and the attention of people across the country because of the uproar. It should clarify what actions it took and why.

It also has the means to protect workers and shoppers. It has a vast surveillan­ce system and support from local police that it uses to control retail theft. Why not draw on those resources to maintain a safe place for people to shop? It should stand by what Target CEO Brian Cornell said recently on the Fortune Leadership Next podcast about the company’s push for diversity and inclusion: “It’s helping us drive sales, it’s building greater engagement with both our teams and our guests, and those are just the right things for our business today.”

And there is a lesson here for many companies as a small but powerful contingent of conservati­ves grapple with accepting transgende­r and queer people as human. As these fights become ever more toxic, companies need to be thoughtful from the get go, not just about their deliberate actions, but also about how they will respond when they are inevitably pulled into the culture wars. There is no golden mean here.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States