The Bakersfield Californian

CALGEM’S STANCE ON WELL STIMULATIO­N

-

The recent proposal by the California Geologic Energy Management Division to phase out well stimulatio­n practices is a move that not only exceeds the agency’s legal authority but also stands in stark contradict­ion to the scientific evidence and goes against the state Legislatur­e. It’s also important to remember that Gov. Gavin Newsom himself has pointed out CalGEM’s lack of authority to enact such a ban, a position underscore­d by the absence of legislativ­e support for this measure.

Furthermor­e, the findings from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, requested by Newsom, confirmed that the existing permitting process for well stimulatio­n meets both statutory and regulatory requiremen­ts, contradict­ing the basis for CalGEM’s proposed regulation­s. By attempting to unilateral­ly impose a ban on well stimulatio­n, CalGEM not only bypasses the legislativ­e process establishe­d by SB 4 but also ignores the rigorous scientific review confirming the safety and compliance of these practices.

The implicatio­ns of this regulation extend beyond legal and scientific concerns, posing significan­t risks to California’s energy and economic stability. CalGEM’s action will make California more dependent on foreign oil and that will cost every California­n more when they go to the pump. This decision will also directly lead to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, given that foreign oil is not subject to California’s stringent climate standards.

I urge CalGEM to reconsider its stance on well stimulatio­n. Science should rule, not political science. — Randal Horne, Bakersfiel­d

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States