The Boston Globe

One year after the fall of Roe v. Wade

25 million living in states with varied limits

- By Geoff Mulvihill, Kimberlee Kruesi, and Claire Savage

One year ago, the US Supreme Court rescinded a fivedecade-old right to abortion, prompting a seismic shift in debates about politics, values, freedom, and fairness.

Twenty-five million women of childbeari­ng age now live in states where the law makes abortions harder to get than they were before the ruling.

Decisions about the law are largely in the hands of state lawmakers and courts. Most Republican-led states have restricted abortion. Fourteen ban abortion in most cases at any point in pregnancy. Twenty Democratic-leaning states including Massachuse­tts have protected access.

Here’s a look at what’s changed since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on ruling.

Laws have been enacted to restrict abortion access

Last summer, as women and medical providers began to navigate a landscape without legal protection for abortion, Nancy Davis’ doctors advised her to terminate her pregnancy because the fetus she was carrying was expected to die soon after birth.

But doctors in Louisiana, where Davis lived, would not provide the abortion due to a new law banning it throughout pregnancy in most cases.

At the same time, abortion opponents who worked for decades to abolish a practice they see as murder cheered the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling. Anti-abortion groups said the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide was undemocrat­ic because it prevented states from enacting bans.

“The Dobbs decision was a democratic victory for life that generation­s fought for,” said E.V. Osment, a spokespers­on for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a major anti-abortion group.

While some states scrambled to pass new restrictio­ns, others already had enacted laws that were designed to take effect if the court overturned Roe.

More than 25 million women ages 15 to 44, or about 2 in 5 nationally, now live in states where there are more restrictio­ns on abortion access than there were before Dobbs.

Davis got help from a fund that raises money for women to travel for abortions and went to New York for a procedure. The whole experience was heartbreak­ing, she said.

“A mother’s love starts as soon as she knows she’s pregnant. That attachment starts instantly,” she said. “It was days I couldn’t sleep. It was days I couldn’t eat.”

Abortion access has been protected in 20 states

As some states restricted abortion, others locked in access. In 25 states, abortion remains generally legal up to at least 24 weeks of pregnancy. Twenty of those states solidified abortion rights through constituti­onal amendments or laws.

CHOICES Center for Reproducti­ve Health had for decades treated patients seeking abortions in Memphis. After Tennessee’s abortion ban kicked in, the clinic opened an outpost three hours away, in Carbondale, Ill.

“They’re coming from Tennessee, Mississipp­i, Arkansas, and even Texas,” said CEO Jennifer Pepper. “But now they’re having to travel much farther.”

The number of abortions is not clear

With lags and gaps in official reporting, the impact of the Dobbs ruling on the number of abortions is not clear.

A survey conducted for the Society of Family Planning, a nonprofit organizati­on that promotes research and supports abortion access, found that the number of abortions fell to nearly zero in states with bans and rose in neighborin­g states with fewer restrictio­ns The survey, however, does not capture self-managed abortions outside the traditiona­l medical system, usually done through a two-pill regimen.

Courts have not been busy with abortion cases

There’s little evidence that doctors, women, or those who help them get abortions are being prosecuted.

The Mississipp­i attorney general’s office says no charges have been brought under a new law that calls for up to 10 years in prison for anyone who provides or attempts to provide an abortion in cases where it wasn’t to save the woman’s life or to end a pregnancy caused by rape or incest.

 ?? JACQUELYN MARTIN/ASSOCIATED PRESS/FILE ?? Lilo Blank (left) and Lisa Verdonik talked about their opposing views on abortion rights last year.
JACQUELYN MARTIN/ASSOCIATED PRESS/FILE Lilo Blank (left) and Lisa Verdonik talked about their opposing views on abortion rights last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States