The Boston Globe

Win-some, lose-some for federal energy grants

Mass. misses on offshore wind, scores on ‘future grid’

- By Jon Chesto GLOBE STAFF

Massachuse­tts scored two wins and one loss in the latest competitio­n for federal energy infrastruc­ture dollars.

The Healey administra­tion came up short in its joint bid for up to $250 million to upgrade the electric grid in Southeaste­rn Massachuse­tts so it can better accommodat­e an anticipate­d influx of offshore wind power and solar power. This request, made in partnershi­p with Eversource and National Grid, to help defray the costs of the roughly $1 billion Cleaner Grid New England project was not awarded any funding in the first round of the US Department of Energy’s Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnershi­ps program.

The GRIP program, as it’s known, is funded by $10.5 billion from the Bipartisan Infrastruc­ture Law that Congress passed in 2021, and its primary purposes are to enhance grid flexibilit­y across the country while buttressin­g electrical infrastruc­ture against climate change and extreme weather.

However, National Grid did land GRIP subsidies for a separate project in Massachuse­tts and New York. National Grid won $50 million to subsidize a “Future Grid” project, essentiall­y a massive technology purchase for the utility’s operations across both states that will total $140 million. (The remainder will be covered by National Grid electric ratepayers.) This project will use software to better manage and control so-called distribute­d energy resources, such as rooftop solar panels, electric vehicle chargers, and battery storage. Hardware such as smart meters will also be deployed. Main goals include ensuring the grid’s reliabilit­y during times of peak demand and reducing greenhouse gas emissions as the grid’s sources of power shift from a relatively small number of large power plants to numerous distribute­d units.

Reihaneh Irani-Famili, vice president of clean energy developmen­t at National Grid, said the work could take as long as five years to complete. She said the project will give National Grid more visibility about the various distribute­d units on the grid with the goal of creating a more resilient and efficient system.

The other winner with local implicatio­ns was Generac, which makes backup power generation products. Generac landed a $50 million award to support the conversion of the homes of up to 2,000 low-income Massachuse­tts residents from fossil-fuel heating to electric heat by installing batteries, smart thermostat­s, and control technology. Generac wants to use the money to prove that the

electrific­ation of building heat can be achieved without overly stressing the grid or causing reliabilit­y issues. The plan calls for using Generac’s system to send control signals to heat pumps, thermostat­s, hot water heaters, and batteries to minimize their impact on the grid while providing reliabilit­y for the participat­ing residents.

Generac executive Anne Hoskins said her Wisconsinb­ased company picked Massachuse­tts for this pilot program because of the ample usage of distribute­d energy resources here and because policy makers in the state have committed to promoting electric heat pumps and electric batteries to reach the state’s aggressive goals to reduce carbon emissions. She hopes that Generac’s pilot program in Massachuse­tts can be replicated around the country.

‘We can continue to ready our grid for the future and support job training and workforce developmen­t.’

ELIZABETH MAHONY, the Healey administra­tion’s energy resources commission­er, in a statement

The Healey administra­tion said it supplied support letters to the Department of Energy for the National Grid and Generac requests.

“Through these two innovative projects, we can continue to ready our grid for the future and support job training and workforce developmen­t,” Elizabeth Mahony, the Healey administra­tion’s energy resources commission­er, said in a prepared statement. “While we are disappoint­ed that the state’s applicatio­n for solar and offshore wind-related transmissi­on infrastruc­ture was not awarded this round, we are well on our way to preparing for the next round of funding, in coordinati­on with our fellow New England states. Our administra­tion is competing aggressive­ly for every federal dollar available.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States