The Boston Globe

Biden inquiry restarted in House

Speaker urges ‘fair’ investigat­ion

- By Jacqueline Alemany

During the 22-day fight to fill the post of House speaker, the Republican-led impeachmen­t inquiry against President Biden gathered dust on the sidelines.

Closed-door transcribe­d interviews with various witnesses and investigat­ive work continued. But since then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a Republican from California, made the sudden decision to launch a formal inquiry, in part to appease hardline Republican­s who would soon move to oust him from the speaker’s seat, momentum behind the effort has waned.

As Republican lawmakers have resumed regular business, the new speaker of the House, a former member of the Judiciary Committee where a part of the inquiry is being conducted, has staked out a different position than those leading the inquiry.

Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, a constituti­onal lawyer by training, has taken a more reserved tone, both publicly and privately, urging members to conduct a thorough and fair investigat­ion with no predetermi­ned outcome. In a closed-door meeting with House GOP moderates this week, he indicated that there is insufficie­nt evidence at the moment to initiate formal impeachmen­t proceeding­s, according to people who attended the meeting.

“We’ll just go where the evidence goes and we’re not there yet,” Representa­tive Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska, said, paraphrasi­ng Johnson’s comments on the inquiry at the Republican Governance Group’s weekly lunch on Tuesday. “Most of us are saying, ‘Look, we can’t even get a single Democratic vote on this right now.’ I think the voters will reject what they are seeing when it comes to Biden [policies] — but high crimes and misdemeano­rs? I don’t think we’ve seen that or enough data to really make a good case and I feel like [Johnson] really agreed with us on that.”

So far, House Republican­s have not put forth any direct evidence that Biden profited from his son Hunter Biden’s work in Ukraine and elsewhere, nor has the president been linked to any potential wrongdoing in the probe of the Justice Department’s investigat­ion of his son — the two issues Republican­s identified when announcing the inquiry.

Republican­s identified two IRS agents who alleged the administra­tion hamstrung the DOJ’s investigat­ion into the president’s son’s finances. But the special counsel in charge of that investigat­ion has flatly rejected that theory, as have other investigat­ors and witnesses involved with the case. The White House has called the inquiry a “baseless, evidence-free” stunt.

Johnson, who told reporters during a news conference last week that he has been “intellectu­ally consistent” in cautioning against a rushed investigat­ion, has previously accused Biden of bribing or pressuring a foreign leader. During a Fox News appearance over the summer, Johnson accused Biden of wielding taxpayer resources to fire Ukraine’s top prosecutor to benefit his son’s business dealings — an allegation widely disputed by both US and foreign officials. And in another interview on Fox News last week, Johnson said that “if, in fact, all the evidence leads to where we believe it will, that’s very likely impeachabl­e offenses.”

But in this week’s private meeting with moderates, Johnson appeared to agree with Republican lawmakers who argued that since Biden’s polling numbers have been so weak, there is less of a political imperative to impeach him, according to Bacon and others at the meeting.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States