The Boston Globe

Governor vetoes ban on care for trans minors

In break with Ohio GOP, calls for hybrid plan

- By Samantha Hendrickso­n and Julie Carr Smyth

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Republican Ohio Governor Mike DeWine vetoed a measure Friday that would have banned gender-affirming care for minors, casting the action, out of step with many in his own party, as thoughtful, limited, and “pro-life.”

He simultaneo­usly announced plans to move to administra­tively ban transgende­r surgeries until a person is 18, and to position the state to better regulate and track gender-affirming treatments in both children and adults.

At a news conference, DeWine said he hoped the hybrid approach could win the support of legislativ­e Republican­s — who immediatel­y signaled they’re considerin­g a veto override — as well as serve as a national model to states, as gender-affirming care restrictio­ns enacted across the country in recent years face lawsuits.

The vetoed bill also would have banned transgende­r athletes’ participat­ion in girls’ and women’s sports.

DeWine said he listened to people on both sides of the legislatio­n who all “sincerely and truly believe their position best protects children,” ultimately deciding he could not support legislatio­n that bans health care so many patients, families, and doctors told him is saving lives.

“Ultimately, these tough, tough decisions should not be made by the government. They should not be made by the state of Ohio,” DeWine said. “They should be made by the people who love these kids the most, and that’s the parents. The parents who have raised that child, the parents who have seen that child go through agony, the parents who worry about that child every single day of their life.”

The governor’s veto drew swift rebukes Friday from supporters of gender-affirming care bans, both in the state and nationally.

Republican Bernie Moreno, a Donald Trump-endorsed candidate for US Senate, and Center for Christian Virtue president Aaron Baer both called on the Legislatur­e to override his veto.

“Mike DeWine has failed Ohio, and it’s our children who are going to pay the price,” Baer said in a statement.

Terry Schilling, president of the conservati­ve American Principles Project, said in a statement that DeWine had succumbed to “egregious lies” being perpetuate­d about transgende­r care. He said history would remember that DeWine “gave into cowardice and caved to the transgende­r industry that is preying on so many vulnerable individual­s.”

Republican state Representa­tive Gary Click, the bill’s sponsor, commended DeWine for trying to wrap his mind around a complex problem in a short amount of time. He defended his own years of research on the bill, and said he was particular­ly disappoint­ed that the ban on transgende­r girls playing sports could be sidelined if non-legislativ­e solutions were pursued on gender-affirming care.

Republican Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens said the chamber was weighing its options with regard to overriding the veto.

House Democrats said the legislatio­n was based on hate and DeWine’s veto supported “fundamenta­l freedom” and parental rights. The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ rights organizati­on, thanked DeWine for “doing the right thing for young trans Ohioans.”

The vetoed bill would have prohibited Ohio minors from receiving gender reassignme­nt surgery, but also from taking puberty blockers or undergoing other hormone therapies. It would have allowed those already undergoing treatments to continue, however.

DeWine directed state agencies to begin the rule-making process to: restrict genderaffi­rming surgeries to adults only; to set up a system for tracking the gender-affirming treatments both minor and adult Ohioans are undergoing; and to prevent “pop-up clinics or fly-by-night operations” from deceptive practices surroundin­g gender-affirming care.

The governor said a small number of Ohio children would have been affected by the bill, “but for those children who face gender dysphoria, and for their families, the consequenc­es of this bill could not be more profound.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States