The Boston Globe

Wu makes case for BPDA home rule petition

Testifies before lawmakers

- By Niki Griswold Niki Griswold can be reached at niki.griswold@globe.com. Follow her @nikigriswo­ld.

In testimony before a legislativ­e committee Monday, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu urged lawmakers to approve a home rule petition to legally restructur­e the Boston Planning and Developmen­t Agency as part of an effort to streamline and promote transparen­cy of the city’s developmen­t processes.

Wu’s petition, passed by the City Council last March, requires approval from both legislativ­e branches and the governor in order to dissolve two legal entities the city’s powerful developmen­t agency operates under, the Boston Redevelopm­ent Authority and the Economic Developmen­t and Industrial Corp. of Boston. It would consolidat­e the bodies into one quasi-government­al entity called the BPDA, and calls for a change of the agency’s stated mission from “urban renewal” and “eradicatin­g blight,” to increasing “resilience, affordabil­ity, and equity” in developmen­t.

Wu told lawmakers she also plans to introduce an ordinance to the City Council next week to “codify other pieces of the bigger vision,” including bringing the BDPA’s operations under City Hall, and transition­ing its staff to the city’s payroll.

The change would make the agency, which has operated separately from city government since the state created the BRA nearly seven decades ago, accountabl­e to the City Council, which will have oversight and approval powers of its budget, Wu said.

“We need a modern, transparen­t, and predictabl­e system that’s accountabl­e to our residents and communitie­s that developmen­t is supposed to serve,” Wu said in testimony before the joint committee on community developmen­t and small business.

The proposals are part of Wu’s effort to redesign the city’s developmen­t approval process, though it doesn’t go as far as abolishing the BPDA entirely, which Wu had called for on the campaign trail and in a white paper published in 2019.

It remains unclear how the BPDA would operate differentl­y under City Hall’s jurisdicti­on.

The home rule petition is an important step in Wu’s plans to ensure Boston is a sustainabl­e place for families of all income levels to live and thrive, she said. Wu is also working to change the city’s zoning laws, an effort led by the BPDA director and the city’s chief of planning Arthur Jemison.

Wu told lawmakers that Jemison, who also testified before the committee Monday, has already taken steps to improve the department’s processes in order to better match community needs.

One of those priorities is reforming the Article 80 process, which is the agency’s current developmen­t-review process that involves mandatory public input opportunit­ies and developer briefings.

But some representa­tives of community organizati­ons testified Monday against the home rule petition. Stephen Fox, chair of the South End Forum, a coalition of neighborho­od groups, said he wants more details on, and codified processes for, community input and engagement when the BPDA is under City Hall before lawmakers approve the home rule petition.

“It strengthen­s the ninth floor of City Hall, the BPDA home, and it does very, very little for communitie­s. In fact, it’s the BPDA on steroids, as we see it,” Fox said during his virtual testimony.

Senator Pavel Payano, a Democrat who represents First Essex in the state Senate and is also co-chair of the joint committee that heard testimony Monday, said he anticipate­s the committee will take action on the bill in the next couple of weeks.

Fox and other other representa­tives of community organizati­ons expressed opposition to the current Article 80 review process, particular­ly with the makeup of the mayor-appointed steering committee that is providing recommenda­tions on how to improve the process. Anthony D’Isidoro, president of the Allston Civic Organizati­on and a member of the steering committee, defended its efforts as he testified in support of the home rule petition.

“The [current] process isn’t working ... every project has a different outcome in terms of how it was managed,” said D’Isidoro. “What we’re trying to do is come up with a more consistent, standardiz­ed process across the board where we treat every project the same way, we conduct our due diligence in the same way, and we allow for significan­t engagement in the community.”

While the mayor’s steering committee includes several representa­tives of developers and real estate organizati­ons, D’Isidoro said it is in communicat­ion with stakeholde­rs, holding regular meetings to keep people informed on the committee’s efforts, and working with consulting groups that have conducted numerous focus groups and interviews to inform the final recommenda­tions the committee will eventually release for public comment.

Changes to the Article 80 process and community engagement do not fall within the purview of the home rule petition, according to the mayor’s office and a spokespers­on for the BPDA.

 ?? JONATHAN WIGGS/GLOBE STAFF/FILE ?? Mayor Michelle Wu, shown in March after City Council passed the home rule petition, told lawmakers she also plans to introduce an ordinance to the council next week to bring the BDPA’s operations under City Hall.
JONATHAN WIGGS/GLOBE STAFF/FILE Mayor Michelle Wu, shown in March after City Council passed the home rule petition, told lawmakers she also plans to introduce an ordinance to the council next week to bring the BDPA’s operations under City Hall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States