UN adopts resolution to ensure AI benefits all
UNITED NATIONS — The General Assembly approved the first United Nations resolution on artificial intelligence Thursday, giving global support to an international effort to ensure the powerful new technology benefits all nations, respects human rights, and is “safe, secure and trustworthy.”
The resolution, sponsored by the United States and cosponsored by 123 countries, was adopted by consensus with a bang of the gavel and without a vote, meaning it has the support of all 193 UN member nations.
US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said earlier this month that adoption of the resolution would be a “historic step forward” in fostering the safe use of AI.
The resolution “would represent global support for a baseline set of principles for the development and use of AI and would lay out a path to leverage AI systems for good while managing the risks,” he said in a statement.
The United States worked with more than 120 countries — including Russia, China, and Cuba — over several months to negotiate the text, senior US officials said.
“In a moment in which the world is seen to be agreeing on little, perhaps the most quietly radical aspect of this resolution is the wide consensus forged in the name of advancing progress,” US Ambassador Linda Thomas Greenfield told the assembly just before the vote.
“The United Nations and artificial intelligence are contemporaries, both born in the years following the Second World War,” she said. “The two have grown and evolved in parallel. Today, as the UN and AI finally intersect we have the opportunity and the responsibility to choose as one united global community to govern this technology rather than let it govern us.”
After the vote, ambassadors from the Bahamas, Japan, the Netherlands, Morocco, Singapore, and the United Kingdom joined the US ambassador at a news conference to support the resolution as an important step for all nations.
The resolution aims to close the digital divide between rich developed countries and poorer developing countries and make sure they are all at the table in discussions on AI. It also aims to make sure that developing countries have the technology and capabilities to take advantage of AI’s benefits, including detecting diseases, predicting floods, helping farmers, and training the next generation of workers.
The resolution recognizes the rapid acceleration of AI development and use and stresses “the urgency of achieving global consen
On Thursday, with the support of all 193 member nations, the United Nations agreed to adopt “a baseline set of principles for the development and use of ” artificial intelligence.
sus on safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems.”
It also recognizes that “the governance of artificial intelligence systems is an evolving area” that needs further discussions on possible governance approaches.
Big tech companies generally have supported the need to regulate AI, while lobbying to ensure any rules work in their favor.
European Union lawmakers gave final approval March 13 to the world’s first comprehensive AI rules, which are on track to take effect by May or June after a few final formalities.
Countries around the world, including the United States and China, and the Group of 20 major industrialized nations are also moving to draw up AI regulations. The UN resolution takes note of other UN efforts including by Secretary General Antonio Guterres and the International Telecommunication Union to ensure that AI is used to benefit the world.
Sullivan said the United States turned to the General Assembly “to have a truly global conversation on how to manage the implications of the fast-advancing technology of AI.”
The resolution encourages all countries, regional and international organizations, tech communities, civil society, the media, academia, research institutions, and individuals “to develop and support regulatory and governance approaches and frameworks” for safe AI systems.
It warns against “improper or malicious design, development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence systems, such as without adequate safeguards or in a manner inconsistent with international law.”