The Boston Globe

House OK’s spending bill, sparking revolt

GOP’s far right threatens to vote speaker out

- By Catie Edmondson

WASHINGTON — The House on Friday passed a $1.2 trillion spending bill to fund the government through September and avert a partial shutdown at the end of the week, setting off a GOP revolt that threatened Speaker Mike Johnson’s hold on his job.

In a 286-134 vote that came down to the wire as leaders scrounged for the two-thirds majority needed for passage, Democrats rallied to provide the support to overcome a furious swell of opposition by conservati­ve Republican­s.

Infuriated by the painstakin­gly negotiated bipartisan legislatio­n to keep funding flowing for government agencies including the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security, the hard right balked, and as the vote was still ongoing, Representa­tive Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia began the process of calling for a vote to oust Johnson.

Greene told reporters on the House steps minutes after the vote that she would not seek an immediate vote on his removal but had begun the process as a “warning” because his actions were a “betrayal.”

“This was our leverage,” Greene said of spending legislatio­n. “This is our chance to secure the border, and he didn’t do it. And now this funding bill passed without the majority of the majority.”

Passage of the bill, just hours before Saturday’s 12:01 a.m. shutdown deadline, set off a sprint in the Senate to avert a lapse in funding. Senators began debate on the legislatio­n Friday afternoon, but it remained unclear whether they would agree to speed it along to passage and send it to President Biden’s desk before midnight.

Federal budget officials, before a potential brief shutdown earlier this month, had said they were not expecting any disruption if funding lapsed briefly over the weekend.

But Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, urged lawmakers to allow swift approval of the spending package.

“Let’s finish the job today,” he said on the Senate floor.

The 1,012-page legislatio­n, which lumped six spending bills into one package, faced an uphill climb in the House after ultraconse­rvatives revolted over the measure. They delivered a series of incensed speeches from the floor that accused Johnson of negotiatin­g legislatio­n that amounted to an “atrocious attack on the American people,” as Greene put it.

No other Republican has said publicly that they would support ousting Johnson, and Democrats have signaled in recent weeks that they might be inclined to help protect him should he face a GOP threat to his post.

But the bill’s passage came at a steep political price for Johnson, who was forced to violate an unwritten but sacrosanct rule among House Republican­s that Greene alluded to against bringing up legislatio­n that cannot draw support from a majority of their members. Just 101 Republican­s, fewer than half, supported it.

That left it to Democrats to again supply the bulk of the votes to push the bill through the House.

“Once again, it’s going to be House Democrats that carry necessary legislatio­n for the American people to the finish line,” Representa­tive Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic leader, told reporters at the Capitol before the vote.

Republican­s won the inclusion of a number of provisions in the spending package, including funding for 2,000 new Border Patrol agents, additional detention beds run by Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, and a provision cutting off aid to the main UN agency that provides assistance to Palestinia­ns. It also increases funding for technology at the southern border by about 25 percent, while cutting funding for the State Department and foreign aid programs by roughly 6 percent.

“House Republican­s achieved conservati­ve policy wins, rejected extreme Democrat proposals and imposed substantia­l cuts while significan­tly strengthen­ing national defense,” Johnson said in a statement. “The process was also an important step in breaking the omnibus muscle memory and represents the best achievable outcome in a divided government.”

Yet conservati­ves said the legislatio­n was insufficie­ntly conservati­ve, citing the $1.2 trillion price tag.

They were particular­ly infuriated to see $200 million in fresh funding for the new FBI headquarte­rs in Maryland, as well as earmarked funding requested by senators for LGBTQ+ centers.

“We got rid of all our poison riders, and Schumer wouldn’t agree to take away their poisonous earmarks,” said Representa­tive Robert Aderholt, Republican of Alabama and chair of the Appropriat­ions subcommitt­ee overseeing labor and health programs. Aderholt opposed the legislatio­n.

Before the vote Friday morning, Representa­tive Andy Biggs, Republican of Arizona, had fumed that the bill was “chockfull of crap” and urged Johnson to be more combative in negotiatio­ns with Democrats.

“Doggone it, fight!” Biggs said. “This is capitulati­on; this is surrender.”

Democrats secured a combined $1 billion in new funding for federal child care and education programs, and a $120 million increase in funding for cancer research.

“This legislatio­n does not have everything either side may have wanted,” said Representa­tive Rosa DeLauro of Connecticu­t, the top Democrat on the Appropriat­ions Committee. “But I am satisfied that many of the extreme cuts and the policies proposed by House Republican­s were rejected.”

Standing on the House floor minutes later, Biggs ruefully agreed with DeLauro’s assessment.

“And yet somehow Republican­s are going to vote for that?” he said. “That’s outrageous. She’s right, though: She got the spending. She killed the riders.”

 ?? ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES ?? Representa­tive Marjorie Taylor Greene began the process of voting on House Speaker Mike Johnson, saying he had betrayed the GOP and given up its leverage.
ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES Representa­tive Marjorie Taylor Greene began the process of voting on House Speaker Mike Johnson, saying he had betrayed the GOP and given up its leverage.
 ?? KEVIN DIETSCH/GETTY IMAGES ??
KEVIN DIETSCH/GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States