The Boston Globe

Rule aims to protect federal employees

Would make firing harder

- By Will Weissert

WASHINGTON — The government’s chief human resources agency issued a new rule on Thursday making it harder to fire thousands of federal employees, hoping to head off former president Donald Trump’s promises to radically remake the workforce along ideologica­l lines if he wins back the White House in November.

The Office of Personnel Management regulation­s will bar career civil servants from being reclassifi­ed as political appointees or as other at-will workers, who are more easily dismissed from their jobs.

It comes in response to Schedule F, an executive order Trump issued in 2020 that sought to allow for reclassify­ing tens of thousands of the 2.2 million federal employees and thus reduce their job security protection­s.

President Biden nullified Schedule F upon taking office. But if Trump were to revive it during a second administra­tion, he could dramatical­ly increase the around 4,000 federal employees who are considered political appointees and typically change with each new president.

Biden called the rule a “step toward combating corruption and partisan interferen­ce to ensure civil servants are able to focus on the most important task at hand: delivering for the American people.’

The potential effects of the change are wide-reaching since how many federal employees might have been affected by Schedule F is unclear. The National Treasury Employee Union used freedom of informatio­n requests to obtain documents suggesting that workers like office managers and specialist­s in human resources and cybersecur­ity might have been among those subject to reclassifi­cation.

The new rule moves to counter a future Schedule F order by spelling out procedural requiremen­ts for reclassify­ing federal employees and clarifying that civil service protection­s accrued by employees can’t be taken away, regardless of job type. It also makes clear that policymaki­ng classifica­tions apply to noncareer, political appointmen­ts.

Good government groups and activists have cheered the change. They viewed cementing federal worker protection­s as a top priority given that replacing existing government employees with new, more conservati­ve alternativ­es is a key piece of a plan spearheade­d by former Trump administra­tion officials and the Heritage Foundation think tank, known as Project 2025.

It calls for vetting and potentiall­y firing scores of federal workers and recruiting conservati­ve replacemen­ts to wipe out what leading Republican­s have long decried as the “deep state” government­al bureaucrac­y.

Doreen Greenwald, president of the treasury union, said the new rule “will now be much harder for any president to arbitraril­y remove the nonpartisa­n profession­als who staff our federal agencies just to make room for hand-picked partisan loyalists.”

But Kentucky Representa­tive James Comer, chair of the House Oversight Committee, countered that it was “yet another example of the Biden Administra­tion’s efforts to insulate the federal workforce from accountabi­lity.”

“The Biden Administra­tion’s rule will further undermine Americans’ confidence in their government since it allows poor performing federal workers and those who attempt to thwart the policies of a duly elected President to remain entrenched in the federal bureaucrac­y,” Comer said in a statement.

He also promised that his committee “will continue to conduct rigorous oversight of the federal workforce” while exploring legislatio­n “to make the unelected, unaccounta­ble federal workforce more accountabl­e.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States