The Boston Globe

Biological determinat­ions matter for the sake of individual­s’ health and medical care

-

If the current leadership of organizati­ons and agencies such as the American Medical Associatio­n, the American Psychologi­cal Associatio­n, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention want to provide the best medicine and future for Americans, they should heed the warning and follow the guidance of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins in their oped, “Sex and gender: The medical establishm­ent’s reluctance to speak honestly about biological reality.”

Sokal and Dawkins are spot-on with their caution of the harm that would be done if public health and health care leaders continue to adopt and promote phrasings such as “sex assigned at birth.” Though perhaps politicall­y well-intended toward promoting greater social justice, this language misleads people into thinking that a person’s biological sex is arbitrary, when it never is. As the authors warn, obscuring biological facts has real medical import and can misinform people in ways that validate ignorance, which itself only enables social injustice.

I am the proud parent of two self-described queer children, one a gender nonconform­ing woman and one transgende­r nonbinary. However, their biological­ly determined sex is female, and that determinat­ion matters for their health and medical care no matter how they experience and live their lives socially.

Though some may disagree, our world improves as we better understand and embrace male boys, male men, male girls, male women, male nonbinary people, female boys, female men, female girls, female women, and female nonbinary people. We can do this without falsifying or muddying long-establishe­d scientific knowledge about the determinat­ion of the sex of human beings.

DR. JAMES L. SHERLEY

Boston

The writer is a physician scientist.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States