Panel gets complaint regarding recount
A Federal Election Commission complaint filed April 19 against Silicon Valley congressional candidate Sam Liccardo alleges he illegally paid for a recount as part of an effort to avoid a three-way race with rivals Joe Simitian and Evan Low.
The complaint said former Liccardo staff member and confidant Jonathan Padilla filed for the recount on April 9, a day after a poll showed the former San Jose mayor was vulnerable if pitted against Simitian and Low in the November general election.
In the March 5 primary election for California's 16th Congressional District, Liccardo received 38,489 votes and Simitian and Low each received 30,249 votes.
The tie set the stage for all three candidates to appear on the November ballot. But the recount effort has uncovered 20 ballots that were excluded from the original count, a development that could swing the results and pare the field down to two candidates.
According to the complaint, Padilla improperly used nearly $100,000 in funds from the Count the Vote PAC, which also was formed April 9, to pay for the recount.
“There is reason to believe that CTV PAC'S disbursements for the recount are `expenditures' because they were made for the express purpose of influencing the outcome of a federal election,” the complaint said, “and further, that they were made in cooperation with or at the request or suggestion of Mr. Liccardo, the Liccardo campaign, or both.”
The complaint said a recount is ordinarily an expense that would be paid for by a campaign, but Liccardo wanted to “avoid negative attention by personally calling for a recount.” Neither Simitian nor Low has asked for a recount, according to the complaint.
The CTV PAC also allowed Liccardo
to skirt contribution limits, according to the complaint.
In response, Padilla said he and his counsel reviewed the complaint.
“It's completely frivolous and it's remarkable the amount of time and energy being put out by the (Santa Clara County Government Attorneys Association) to try to basically create this false narrative of Sam and I coordinating, as opposed to them concentrating on counting the votes that we found over the course of the last few days at the registrar.
“We have a modern-day Tammany Hall with a lot of discussion of interest in Santa Clara County. … Evan Low is very much a part of this kind of political machine. They can't control me and they're grasping at straws to try to tie Sam and me together.”
In a statement, Low campaign spokesperson Clay Volino said: “Sam and his dark money Super PAC appear to be breaking the law. Padilla still hasn't answered who's bankrolling this effort to do Liccardo's dirty work, but whoever they are, we hope the FEC will hold them accountable.”
Spokespersons for Liccardo's and Simitian's campaigns declined to comment.
CTV PAC treasurer James Sutton, Neighbors for Results PAC treasurer Matthew Alvarez and Liccardo campaign treasurer Melissa Nissen also are listed as respondents in the complaint, in addition to Liccardo and Padilla.
The complaint said Padilla and Sutton have “deep connections”
with Liccardo and his current campaign. The former has served on a previous campaign and the latter has represented Liccardo, his previous campaigns, or groups associated with him prior to the election cycle.
The Neighbors for Results PAC has spent over $200,000 supporting Liccardo's congressional candidacy, according to the complaint. In addition, Alvarez represented Padilla, Sutton's law partner, by filing the recount request on his behalf.
“Together, the poll, CTV PAC'S recent formation, and the relationship between the stakeholders involved — Mr. Liccardo, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Sutton and his law group — provide compelling support for the conclusion that they may have illegally coordinated CTV PAC'S expenditures for the recount,” the complaint said.
Santa Clara County Government Attorneys Association President Max Zarzana filed the FEC complaint.
“No reasonable person would believe that Sam's close, personal friend and former staffer, Jonathan Padilla, went to all of this trouble because he loves democracy,” Zarzana said in a statement. “Who is paying for this recount and what's in it for them?”
The complaint calls on the FEC to investigate the allegations and fine Liccardo and others involved in the recount effort the “maximum amount permitted by law.”