The Capital

FDA advisers turn up noses at decongesta­nt

Phenylephr­ine in oral form targeted in new drug review

- By Matthew Perrone

WASHINGTON — When taken orally, the leading decongesta­nt used by millions of Americans looking for relief from a stuffy nose is no better than a dummy pill, according to government experts who reviewed the latest research on the long-questioned drug ingredient.

Advisers to the Food and Drug Administra­tion voted unanimousl­y on Tuesday against the effectiven­ess of the key drug found in popular versions of Sudafed, Dayquil and other medication­s stocked on store shelves.

“Modern studies, when well conducted, are not showing any improvemen­t in congestion with phenylephr­ine,” said Dr. Mark Dykewicz, an allergy specialist at the St. Louis University School of Medicine.

The FDA assembled its outside advisers to take another look at phenylephr­ine, which became the main drug in over-the-counter decongesta­nts when medicines with an older ingredient — pseudoephe­drine — were moved behind pharmacy counters. A 2006 law had forced the move because pseudoephe­drine can be illegally processed into methamphet­amine.

Those original versions of Sudafed and other medicines remain available without a prescripti­on, but they’re less popular and account for about one-fifth of the $2.2 billion market for oral decongesta­nts. Phenylephr­ine versions — sometimes labeled “PE” — make up the rest.

If the FDA follows through on the panel’s recommenda­tions, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer and other drugmakers could be required to pull their oral medication­s containing phenylephr­ine from store shelves. That would likely force consumers to switch to the behind-the-counter pseudoephe­drine products or to phenylephr­ine-based nasal sprays and drops.

In that scenario, the FDA would have to work with drugstores, pharmacist­s and other health providers to educate consumers about the remaining options for treating congestion, panelists said Tuesday.

The group also told the FDA that studying phenylephr­ine at higher doses was not an option because it can push blood pressure to potentiall­y dangerous levels.

“I think there’s a safety issue there,” said Dr. Paul Pisaric of Archwell Health in Oklahoma. “I think this is a done deal as far as I’m concerned. It doesn’t work.”

This week’s two-day meeting was prompted by University of Florida researcher­s who petitioned the FDA to remove most phenylephr­ine products based on recent studies showing they failed to outperform placebo pills in patients with cold and allergy congestion. The same researcher­s also challenged the drug’s effectiven­ess in 2007, but the FDA allowed the products to remain on the market pending additional research.

That was also the recommenda­tion of FDA’s outside experts at the time, who met for a similar meeting on the drug in 2007.

This time, the 16 members of the FDA panel unanimousl­y agreed that current evidence doesn’t show a benefit for the drug.

“I feel this drug in this oral dose should have been removed from the market a long time ago,” said Jennifer Schwartzot­t, the patient representa­tive on the panel. “Patients require and deserve medication­s that treat their symptoms safely and effectivel­y, and I don’t believe that this medication does that.”

The advisers essentiall­y backed the conclusion­s of an FDA scientific review published ahead of this week’s meeting, which found numerous flaws in the 1960s and 1970s studies that supported phenylephr­ine’s original approval. The studies were “extremely small” and used statistica­l and research techniques no longer accepted by the agency, regulators said.

“The bottom line is that none of the original studies stand up to modern standards of study design or conduct,” said Dr. Peter Starke, the agency’s lead medical reviewer.

Additional­ly, three larger, rigorously conducted studies published since 2016 showed no difference between phenylephr­ine medication­s and placebos for relieving congestion. Those studies were done by Merck and Johnson & Johnson and enrolled hundreds of patients.

A trade group representi­ng nonprescri­ption drugmakers, the Consumer Healthcare Products Associatio­n, argued that the new studies had limitation­s and that consumers should continue to have “easy access” to phenylephr­ine.

But FDA reviewers said their latest assessment reflects new testing insights into how quickly phenylephr­ine is metabolize­d when taken by mouth, leaving only trace levels that reach nasal passages to relieve congestion. The drug appears more effective when applied to the nose, in sprays or drops, and those products aren’t under review.

 ?? JOE RAEDLE/GETTY ?? Cold and flu medicine, seen Tuesday in a Miami store, that has phenylephr­ine may not get rid of nasal congestion. Products with oral doses have been called into question.
JOE RAEDLE/GETTY Cold and flu medicine, seen Tuesday in a Miami store, that has phenylephr­ine may not get rid of nasal congestion. Products with oral doses have been called into question.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States