The Columbus Dispatch

Sweepstake­s scams offer criminals an old, reliable con

- By Kurt Ludlow WBNS-10TV

The letter offered terrific news: Roger Brink had won $850,000 and a luxury car in a Publishers Clearing House contest.

The official-looking notificati­on, printed on what appeared to be the letterhead of the well-known magazine marketer (think PCH Prize Patrol), was accompanie­d by a facsimile of a check — written to Brink in the amount of $850,000 — and a photograph of the sporty white Mercedes he soon would be driving around town.

Brink figured he had hit the jackpot.

In reality, he had been hit by one of the oldest — and most insidious — con games around: the so-called sweepstake­s scam.

The scam is a fixture on the Federal Trade Commission’s annual list of top complaint generators. For 2013, it had the dubious distinctio­n of being No. 6 on the list, having triggered 89,944 complaints to the agency last year.

“That number may sound high, but the actual (number of victims) is probably even higher,” notes the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, one of several federal agencies charged with combating the crime.

“Victims of prize or sweepstake­s fraud often never report it to authoritie­s. It can be embarrassi­ng, even humiliatin­g, to admit you’ve been had.”

“Winners” often receive a partial-payment check — usually for a few thousand dollars — along with instructio­ns to wire back a portion of the advance to cover insurance, processing fees or other administra­tive expenses.

Sometimes, scammers don’t ever bother to send a counterfei­t check. They simply ask prospectiv­e victims to pay the miscellane­ous fees upfront, usually via a prepaid card such as Green Dot’s MoneyPak.

Supposedly, in either case, as soon as the fees are paid, the full jackpot will be disbursed. Obviously, it never is.

Year in and year out, older Americans are favorite targets.

AARP says that people 55 to 64 years old are twice as likely as their younger counterpar­ts to fall for sweepstake­s schemes. Those older than 65 are almost three times as likely to become victims. Brink is 87 years old. When he called the phone number provided with his prize-notificati­on letter, he was told to remit $6,000 to cover expenses.

To come up with that much money, Brink had to tap his savings and cash out an insurance policy.

As instructed, he then submitted the payment and waited for the promised prizes to arrive at his Mulberry, Kan., home.

“They kept saying, ‘At 3 o’clock today, you’ll have everything — you’ll have everything.’ Well, they didn’t, and I don’t.”

And, barring a miracle, he never will.

The sweepstake­s that Brink purportedl­y won had no ties to Publishers Clearing House, which has awarded more than $223 million in prizes since its founding in 1953.

“Consumers should always remember that, at Publishers Clearing House, no payment or fee is ever necessary to enter or claim a prize,” the New Yorkbased company notes on its website. Brink knows that — now. “I don’t want anybody to know what a damn fool I was,” he said, “but I don’t want anybody else to fall for it.”

Sadly, because of his gullibilit­y the first time around, Brink is more likely to be a target again.

Sally Greenberg, executive director of the National Consumers League, said Brink almost certainly will end up on a list maintained by con artists overseas.

“It’s called a ‘suckers list,’” she said. “They make billions of dollars scamming consumers around the world, and they trade informatio­n. A fraudster will call a previous victim and say: ‘I know you lost $10,000. For a mere $1,000, we’re going to help you get all that money back.’

“And that should be a red flag that it is — yet again — another scam.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States