The Columbus Dispatch

Dress codes for parties must be clear for guests

- JUDITH MARTIN joie de vivre, Write to Miss Manners — who sometimes responds with help from daughter Jacobina Martin or son Nicholas Ivor Martin — at www.missmanner­s.com.

Which of the following correctly describes the reason for including a dress code with an invitation?

To sharpen your rapier wit on your would-be guests.

To inspire your friends to reach new heights of sartorial creativity, challengin­g them to think “outside the box.” (Inside the box there is now so much unclaimed real estate that those of us still in residence are not coming out, barring actual flooding.)

To sow confusion. If you chose any or all of the above, you may join the majority of your fellow citizens who celebrate their individual­ity by conforming as strictly as possible to the prejudices of their peers. It is more crowded in this box than Miss Manners had thought.

The purpose of a dress code is to save your guests from having to guess what is expected, while comforting them that if they wear what is asked, they will not spend the evening dodging dirty looks from a partner — or having to regale friends with the hilarious story of how their ties got caught in the car door.

Miss Manners would have thought this would be appreciate­d by the perpetuall­y overbooked and uncomforta­ble Modern Lady and Gentleman.

Such is not the case.

Miss Manners does realize that some of the more fanciful dress codes are intended to be humorous and playful, but there are places where humor does not belong. Fire exit signs and confession­s that you wrecked your parents’ car come to mind.

A proper dress code should be understand­able to its intended audience. Once upon a time, it was understood that “formal” meant white tie, “informal” meant black tie, and the absence of a direction was what some now term “business attire.”

Decades of improvisat­ion have destroyed that understand­ing, relegating such terms to the waste bin of useless words, where they sit next to “semiformal” and “inflammabl­e,” awaiting a final disposal that never comes.

“Black tie,” “jacket and tie,” and, in the case of public accommodat­ions, “no flip-flops” lack but they make up for it in intelligib­ility.

Notice that most dress codes specify what is expected of the gentleman, rather than the lady. One would think husbands would be used to this by now, but the reason for it is practical. Male clothing, particular­ly as it increases in formality, is more prescribed than female clothing. Who, other than the owner, can say which is a lady’s second-best dress?

If all this is too much for you when issuing invitation­s, there is no requiremen­t to specify a dress code at all. The smart (though confused) guest will call and ask, and you can then discuss it as you wish. At least it will take less time than trying to parse the difference­s between “cocktail attire,” “smart casual,” “tea-party dress,” “country club wear” and “after-5 attire.”

As for “business casual,” Miss Manners suspects that it is not a dress code at all, but an accounting practice, accessoriz­ed with handcuffs and subpoenas.

How long do you have to send out wedding thank-you cards?

Starting from the time that each gift arrives, until you reach the end of the list of people to whom you should be thankful. And, Miss Manners decrees, not a minute longer.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States