Judge kicks suit alleging Trump business confl icts

WASHINGTON — In a legal victory for the Trump administration, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Thursday that accused President Donald Trump of violating the Constitution by continuing to own and profit from his business empire.

The complaint, filed this year in the Southern District of New York, said that Trump’s failure to divorce himself from his businesses had harmed companies or workers who compete against his restaurants or hotels in New York or Washington. By taking advantage of his official position, the lawsuit said, Trump violated clauses of the Constitution that prohibit a president from accepting any government-bestowed benefits, or emoluments, either at home or abroad.

Judge George Daniels of U.S. District Court in Manhattan found that the plaintiffs had failed to show that they had suffered as a result of specific actions by Trump intended to drum up business for his enterprises. Even before Trump took office, the judge said, “he had amassed wealth and fame and was competing against” the plaintiffs.

“It is only natural that interest in his properties has generally increased since he became president,” the judge said. Moreover, Daniels said, customers might be patronizing Trump’s hotels and his hotels’ restaurants because of price or quality — reasons totally unrelated to his presidency.

Beyond that, the judge found, the emoluments clauses of the Constitution are intended to protect the country against presidential corruption from foreign influences or financial incentives that might be offered by either states or the federal government. They were not meant to protect businesses from competition from presidentially owned enterprises, he ruled.