The Columbus Dispatch

Google’s Chrome browser blocking annoying ads

- Hayley Tsukayama

Google, already one of the dominant players in the online advertisin­g world, might soon have even more power in that space. It is now taking on the challenge of determinin­g what’s a good ad or a bad ad to decide which ones the majority of web users see.

Google’s Chrome browser, which is used by about 60 percent of desktop and mobile Internet users, began automatica­lly blocking some of the web’s most annoying ads last week. Those include video ads that play automatica­lly with sound, pop-up ads with countdowns, and “sticky” ads that take up a large part of the screen no matter how much you scroll down to lose them.

There types of ads do not meet new standards set by the Coalition for Better Ads, a group of internet companies, online advertiser­s and publishers looking for a way to make online advertisin­g more palatable to users. (The Washington Post is a member of the Interactiv­e Advertisin­g Bureau, one of the groups involved in the coalition.)

Google’s stated goal is to make the web less infuriatin­g to navigate. “It’s clear that annoying ads degrade what we all love about the Web,” Chrome Vice President Rahul Roy-Chowdhury said Tuesday in a company blog post.

Using the coalition’s standards, Google will evaluate the advertisem­ents on websites and rate them as acceptable or failing. Sites then have 30 days to shape up their advertisin­g and submit themselves for re-evaluation, or they face having their ads blocked by Chrome.

According to Google, it has identified 1,500 of the internet’s mosttraffi­cked sites with ads that violate the new standards. About 850 of those have a failing status, meaning they could see their ads blocked in the next 30 days.

Publishers are the most likely to take an initial hit from Google’s ad changes, said Peter Reinhardt, chief executive of the Segment customerda­ta platform. Media companies have been more aggressive about the types of advertisem­ents they use, he said, as Google and Facebook have tightened their hold on the digital-ad industry. Those two internet giants received 60 percent of the country’s digital-advertisin­g dollars in 2017, according to the research firm eMarketer.

Google’s move with Chrome follows Apple’s decision last June to put features addressing online advertisin­g into its Safari browser. But the two companies’ approaches to ad blocking are quite different, Reinhardt said. Apple’s changes targeted advertiser­s who track users across the web and compile data, rather than blocking the ads’ appearance. Since the Safari change, some advertiser­s have seen revenue fall by as much as 20 percent, Reinhardt said.

Google aims to change how websites look and behave when people are using them. It also offers an alternativ­e to third-party ad-blockers, which often block both ads and trackers. That might be more palatable to Google and other companies that profit from advertisin­g. By addressing the ads that Google surveys have found to be most annoying, Chrome’s tool might persuade internet users not to take more drastic options that hide or eliminate all online ads on their screens.

An Internet free of tracking and ads is obviously not Google’s endgame. After all, the company makes most of its money through advertisin­g — more than $95 billion last year. Although some people see this as reforming the ad industry from the inside, Google is fielding criticism for the way the blocker is being implemente­d.

Some note that the company had a lot of say in writing the standards, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. Paul Boyle, vice president of public policy for the News Media Alliance, told The Associated Press that Google’s decision to incorporat­e these standards into Chrome turns voluntary standards into de facto law.

Reinhardt said the new Chrome feature probably will accelerate new trends in the digital ad space, including fueling Google and Facebook’s ad duopoly. As for publishers, he said, it’s already clear that many are pushing subscripti­ons more heavily to offset the need for more aggressive advertisin­g — a trend that Google’s new tool probably will encourage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States