The Columbus Dispatch

Women control interestin­g game of thrones

- By Ann Hornaday The Washington Post

Like “The Favourite,” "Mary Queen of Scots”

— the story of the titular Titian-haired monarch who returned to her native Scotland in 1561 to take her place on the throne — is filled with palace intrigue; power plays; and tetchy, protofemin­ist frenemy-ship.

But even as it indulges its share of "Favourite"-level revisionis­m, the engaging period drama plays it relatively straight in terms of the courtly manners and scheming competitio­n viewers might expect from a good, old-fashioned Tuds-andstuds showdown.

The "Tud," of course, is Tudor descendant Elizabeth I, who, when Mary makes her claim in Scotland, must navigate the developmen­t both as a carefully tended alliance and a serious danger to her own all-powerful standing as the rightful English sovereign.

Based on John Guy's award-winning biography, "Mary Queen of Scots" focuses mostly on the young, widowed Mary Stuart as she plots her consolidat­ion of power, considers various suitors, navigates a disastrous marriage and communicat­es with her cousin Elizabeth in a series of diplomatic­ally worded letters dripping with unspoken parries and thrusts.

The film, directed by Josie Rourke from a script by "House of Cards" writer Beau Willimon, often feels more dutiful than imaginativ­e, despite some nontraditi­onal casting choices (Gemma Chan and Adrian Lester, who are of Asian and African descent respective­ly, have prominent roles in Elizabeth's court; the Puerto Rican actor Ismael Cruz Cordova plays Mary's Italian friend, David Rizzio).

The drama, such as it is, transpires in an episodic collection of expository scenes meant to impart huge amounts of informatio­n with efficiency and clarity, whether it's David Tennant’s Protestant cleric John Knox railing against Queen Mary or Guy Pearce's William Cecil pouring both poison and prudence into Elizabeth's ear.

The net effect is a film that's not particular­ly cinematic (Rourke is a lauded theater director in London) but is intriguing and handsomely conceived. The most spirited heart and poignant soul of the film are Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie as Mary and Elizabeth, whose contradict­ory relationsh­ip accommodat­es hostility, jealousy, admiration and sisterly love with affecting seamlessne­ss.

Outfitted in a marvelous set of elaborate wigs, Ronan portrays Mary as both gutsy and guileless, an impulsive but disarmingl­y straightfo­rward leader with a refreshing common touch. And Robbie

brings stores of empathy to a monarch who at one point wistfully notes that she has become "more man than woman," her emotional and sexual needs subsumed by the state she rules and comes to personify.

Although Elizabeth and Mary never actually met, "Mary Queen of Scots" doesn't let that fact get in the way of a scene late in the film that's staged too cleverly by half.

Still, the deep feelings that coursed between these figures make for an absorbing, thought-provoking meditation on one of history's great what-ifs: Had the two fascinatin­g, formidable women been allowed to collaborat­e without petty male egos and religious feuds swirling around them, heaven knows what they might have accomplish­ed.

 ?? [LIAM DANIEL/FOCUS FEATURES] ?? Mary Stuart (Saoirse Ronan) in “Mary Queen of Scots”
[LIAM DANIEL/FOCUS FEATURES] Mary Stuart (Saoirse Ronan) in “Mary Queen of Scots”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States