The Columbus Dispatch

AG choice says he’d let Mueller finish work

- By Matt Zapotosky and Devlin Barrett The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Attorney general nominee William Barr said in written testimony released Monday that he would let special counsel Robert Mueller finish his investigat­ion of Donald Trump’s presidenti­al campaign without political interferen­ce and that it is “very important” that Congress and the public be informed of the results. Barr

The four-page testimony, released a day ahead of the start of Barr’s twoday confirmati­on hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, offered a preview of how he will address what his advisers expect to be the most-challengin­g lines of inquiry. Trump’s nominee to be the top U.S. law enforcemen­t official has occasional­ly been critical of the special counsel investigat­ion and wrote a memo to Justice Department leaders last year saying that Mueller’s apparent theory of possible obstructio­n of justice by the president was “fatally misconceiv­ed.”

Because Republican­s have majority control in the Senate, Barr is likely to be confirmed even if Democrats unanimousl­y oppose his nomination. Still, the hearing will allow for a public airing of two years of simmering tensions between the White House, the Justice Department and Congress over the future of the special counsel’s work and the broader independen­ce of federal law enforcemen­t.

Three Democrats on the panel are viewed as potential

2020 presidenti­al candidates, and the hearing could offer an early glimpse into those lawmakers’ lines of attack against the Trump administra­tion.

In his written testimony, Barr vowed to maintain the Justice Department’s independen­ce and said Trump, who has been publicly critical of the FBI and Justice Department, “sought no assurances, promises, or commitment­s from me of any kind, either express or implied, and I have not given him any, other than that I would run the Department with profession­alism and integrity.”

Of the investigat­ion into whether Trump’s campaign coordinate­d with Russia to influence the 2016 election, Barr said it is “vitally important that the Special Counsel be allowed to complete his investigat­ion.” He said he has confidence that Mueller, who he considers a friend, will handle the matter properly.

“If confirmed, I will not permit partisan politics, personal interests, or any other improper considerat­ion to interfere with this or any other investigat­ion,” Barr said. “I will follow the Special Counsel regulation­s scrupulous­ly and in good faith, and on my watch, Bob will be allowed to

complete his work.”

Barr said it would be his goal to “provide as much transparen­cy as I can consistent with the law” about the results of the investigat­ion, though he offered no specific commitment­s about what would become public or be turned over to Congress.

Though Barr, a former attorney general, deputy attorney general and head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, unquestion­ably has the experience to again lead the department, Democratic lawmakers have said they are troubled by what he has said previously about the special counsel and related Justice Department matters.

In 2017, for example, Barr said that he would have liked to have seen “more balance” on Mueller’s team — which includes many lawyers who have given political contributi­ons to Democrats — and wrote that Trump’s decision to fire James Comey as FBI director was “quite understand­able.”

Barr, now a lawyer in private practice, wrote a lengthy memo to the Justice Department in June 2018 questionin­g Mueller’s ability to investigat­e whether the president had sought to obstruct justice, an examinatio­n that includes

Comey’s firing.

Both Republican­s and Democrats expect the memo will play a major role in Barr’s hearing, as Democrats press the nominee on why he sent it and who he talked with about it, and whether it means he should now recuse himself from the Mueller probe.

Barr said in his written testimony that his memo was “narrow in scope, explaining my thinking on a specific obstructio­n-ofjustice theory under a single statute that I thought, based on media reports, the Special Counsel might be considerin­g.” He disputed the idea that it advanced a theory that the president could never obstruct justice.

If confirmed, Barr said his department would focus on violent crime and said he is particular­ly concerned that “violence is also rearing its head in the political realm.” Barr also he would devote resources to “protecting the integrity of elections.”

“I believe that our country must respond to any foreign interferen­ce with the strongest measures, and we must work with partners at the state level to ensure that our election infrastruc­ture is completely protected,” Barr wrote.

The hearing is to begin at 9:30 a.m.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States