The Columbus Dispatch

Worthingto­n sets LGBTQ proposal

- By Kevin Stankiewic­z The Columbus Dispatch

Worthingto­n is looking to become the third city in Franklin County to establish a nondiscrim­ination ordinance to bolster legal protection­s for LGBTQ people.

City council is set to formally introduce the legislatio­n in April, following weeks of discussion and tweaks to the proposal by the city’s Community Relations Commission.

The ordinance would make it illegal to deny employment, housing or other public accommodat­ions in Worthingto­n on the basis of sexual orientatio­n or gender expression. It also would extend those protection­s to colleges and universiti­es.

City Council President Bonnie Michael said Worthingto­n believes in equality and acceptance, and the nondiscrim­ination ordinance is an amplificat­ion of those values.

“It’d be nice if this type of thing didn’t have to be done community by community,” Michael said, referencin­g the lack of statewide protection­s.

Ohio is among 28 states where sexual orientatio­n and gender expression are not protected classes, according to Freedom for All Americans, a campaign working to extend protection­s for LGBTQ people nationwide.

However, Columbus, Bexley and 19 other cities in the state, as well as Cuyahoga and Summit counties, have nondiscrim­ination ordinances.

“Local communitie­s really have to take this up themselves if they want to be seen as welcoming and affirming to LGBTQ people,” said Grant Stancliff, communicat­ions director for the advocacy group Equality Ohio. “Most people don’t know that it’s generally legal in Ohio to fire someone because they’re gay.”

A bill that would prohibit discrimina­tion in Ohio on the basis of sexual orientatio­n or gender identity statewide was first introduced in the Ohio House in 2009 by Sen. Nickie Antonio, D-lakewood. But the bill —known as the Ohio Fairness Act — hasn’t made much headway in Republican­dominated legislatur­es.

The latest iteration, which has some bipartisan support and was discussed Wednesdaya­t a hearing of the Ohio Senate Judiciary Committee, would update the state’s anti-discrimina­tion laws to include employment, housing and public-accommodat­ion protection­s for members of the LGBTQ community.

Although a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states, Ohioans can still be denied housing, employment or services based on sexual orientatio­n or gender expression without repercussi­ons to the employer, business or landlord.

Worthingto­n’s ordinance has been in the works for about a year, said Jack Miner, chair of the nine-member CRC, which advises thecouncil on matters related to “fair and equal treatment” for allpeople, according to the city’s website.

At a recent meeting,council members and the CRC went over a second draft of the ordinance that includes changes to how the city would investigat­e claims of discrimina­tion on the basis of sexual orientatio­n and gender identity.

Public forums also have been held, and the city is stillgathe­ring feedback on the ordinance’s final language, Michael said. The focus is largely on shoring up the enforcemen­t process, she said.

Worthingto­n would forward discrimina­tion claims involving stateprote­cted classes, such as race and gender, to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. For cases the city ends up handling — those dealing with Worthingto­n-specific classes, such as sexual orientatio­n, gender expression and marital status — voluntary mediation is offered first, Miner said. But if mediation is unsuccessf­ul, under the current proposal Worthingto­n could hire outside counsel to further investigat­e the discrimina­tion claims. If there is evidence of probable cause, a city-run hearing will be held that, ultimately, could result in a guilty party being issued a cease-anddesist order and a fine. The amount of the fine could range from a maximum of $1,000 for a first-time offender to $5,000 for three guilty offenses in a five-year period. The penalties are civil, not criminal offenses, which Stancliff said Equality Ohio said is the best approach.

“It’s not about throwing people in jail because they discrimina­te,” Stancliff said. “It’s about an opportunit­y to educate people and to get the community in a place where people understand what discrimina­tion is and why it’s wrong.”

The feedback received by the CRC in its public meetings has largely been positive, Miner said, adding that both the business and faith communitie­s have been supportive. The draft ordinance includes exemptions for religious groups.

While the proposal may receive additional tweaks, Miner is hopeful Worthingto­n’s nondiscrim­ination ordinance will become law.

“This is an opportunit­y to say who we are,” he said

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States