The Columbus Dispatch

Contempt citations advance

- By Matthew Daly and Michael Balsamo

After White House claims executive privilege in census probe, House panel cites Barr, Ross

WASHINGTON — A House committee voted Wednesday to hold two top Trump administra­tion officials in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with subpoenas for documents related to a decision adding a citizenshi­p question to the 2020 census.

The Democratic­controlled House Oversight Committee voted 24-15 to advance contempt measures against Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. The vote sends the measures to the full House.

The committee’s action marks an escalation of Democratic efforts to use their House majority to aggressive­ly investigat­e the inner workings of the Trump administra­tion.

The White House asserted executive privilege on the matter earlier Wednesday. The Justice Department said officials had “engaged in good-faith efforts” to satisfy the committee’s oversight needs and labeled the planned contempt vote “unnecessar­y and premature.”

Democrats fear the citizenshi­p question will reduce census participat­ion in immigrant-heavy communitie­s and result in a severe undercount of minority voters. They say they want specific documents to determine why Ross added the question to the 2020 census and contend the administra­tion has declined to provide the documents despite repeated requests.

The administra­tion has turned over more than 17,000 pages of documents and Ross testified for nearly seven hours in March. The Justice Department said two senior officials were interviewe­d by committee staff members and said officials were working to produce tens of thousands of additional pages of relevant documents.

The oversight panel’s chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, disputed the Justice Department’s account and said most of the documents turned over to the committee had already been made public.

“We must protect the integrity of the census, and we must stand up for Congress’ authority under the Constituti­on to conduct meaningful oversight,” Cummings said Wednesday.

The administra­tion’s refusal to turn over requested documents “does not appear to be an effort to engage in good-faith negotiatio­ns or accommodat­ions,” he said. “Instead, it appears to be another example of the administra­tion’s blanket defiance of Congress’ constituti­onally mandated responsibi­lities.”

Trump has pledged to “fight all the subpoenas” issued by Congress and says he won’t work on legislativ­e priorities, such as infrastruc­ture, until Congress halts investigat­ions of his administra­tion.

Ross told the committee the March 2018 decision to add the question was based on a Justice Department request to help it enforce the Voting Rights Act.

Cummings disputed that, citing documents unearthed last week suggesting that the real reason the administra­tion sought to add the citizenshi­p question was to help officials gerrymande­r legislativ­e districts in overtly partisan and racist ways.

Computer files from North Carolina redistrict­ing expert Tom Hofeller include detailed calculatio­ns that lay out gains Republican­s would see in Texas by basing legislativ­e districts on the number of votingage citizens rather than the total population.

Hofeller, a Republican operative who died last year, said in the documents that GOP gains would be possible only if the census asked every household about its members’ immigratio­n status for the first time since 1950.

The Supreme Court is considerin­g the citizenshi­p question. A ruling is expected by the end of the month.

“I think it’s totally ridiculous that we would have a census without asking” about citizenshi­p, President Donald Trump said Wednesday, “but the Supreme Court is going to be ruling on it soon. I think when the census goes out ... you have the right to ask whether or not somebody is a citizen of the United States.”

Some of the documents the committee is seeking are protected by attorneycl­ient privilege and other confidenti­al processes, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd said. The president has made a “protective assertion” of executive privilege so the administra­tion can fully review all of the documents, he added.

“The president, the Department of Justice, has every right to do that,” White House counselor Kellyanne Conway said on MSNBC. Democrats are “asking for documents that are privileged, and I would hope that they can continue to negotiate and speak about what is appropriat­e and what is not, but the world is watching. This country sees that they’d rather continue to investigat­e than legislate.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-MD., said the administra­tion has thwarted congressio­nal efforts to obtain key documents and exercise legitimate oversight. “All we get from the administra­tion is a middle finger” of defiance, Raskin said. “And that’s not appropriat­e for the power of Congress.”

A vote by the full House to hold Barr and Ross in contempt on the census issue would be a political blow but would not result in real punishment since the men are unlikely to go to jail or be arrested.

 ?? [J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS] ?? Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan of Urbana, the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, was alongside Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-MD., on Wednesday as the panel considered holding Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt for failing to turn over subpoenaed documents. The panel eventually did recommend contempt citations to the full House.
[J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS] Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan of Urbana, the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, was alongside Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-MD., on Wednesday as the panel considered holding Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt for failing to turn over subpoenaed documents. The panel eventually did recommend contempt citations to the full House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States