The Columbus Dispatch

Organic food, bottled water unlikely to improve health, increase life span

- Dr. Roach Dr. Roach regrets that he is unable to answer individual letters, but will incorporat­e them in the column whenever possible. Readers may email questions to Toyourgood­health@ med.cornell.edu or send mail to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 32803.

Dear Dr. Roach: Does eating strictly organic food and drinking only bottled water help in a meaningful way to prevent diseases and contribute to a long and healthy life? — M.T.

A: There is no consistent high-quality evidence that consuming organic foods lead to improvemen­t in health outcomes, including longer life. Some, but not all, studies have found slightly higher amounts of nutrients in organicall­y grown produce. Organic foods are made without synthetic pesticides, but may use pesticides found in nature. There is not convincing evidence that natural pesticides are any safer, nor that the small amount of residual pesticides left in convention­al produce leads to significan­t health risks. However, there is preliminar­y evidence that consumptio­n of mostly organic food led to a decrease in the risk of one type of cancer, non-hodgkin’s lymphoma, but not an overall decrease in cancer. Based on current available evidence, I don’t recommend organic food consumptio­n for health benefits.

The quality of tap water varies greatly across North America, but most locations have high-quality water available at extremely low cost with minimal environmen­tal impact compared with bottled water. Even if tap water is unpalatabl­e in a person’s location, I recommend a filter system rather than bottled water, again for environmen­tal concerns as well as cost.

Dear Dr. Roach: All of the latest informatio­n states that an adult needs seven to nine hours of sleep a night. Is this “unbroken” sleep? For example, I sleep for four hours, wake up for one to two hours, and then sleep three to four more hours almost every night. If the sleep is to be continuous, is it better to take a sleeping aid or continue with the current pattern? Nothing I read indicates if sleeping seven to nine hours with a sleeping aid provides the same benefit as not sleeping continuous­ly. — P.M.

A: While it is true that people who sleep seven to nine hours per night tend to live longer than those who sleep less (or more), it is likely that there are some people who need more or less sleep than the average. Further, it isn’t clear whether the apparent improvemen­t in longevity is due to better sleeping, or whether people who don’t sleep well have an underlying medical condition that is really responsibl­e for the harm seen. As far as whether continuous sleep is better than interrupte­d sleep, there isn’t good evidence to compare the two.

Most sleeping aids adversely affect sleep quality, and increase risk of falls and accidents the next day. If interrupte­d sleep is working for you, continue that versus using a sleeping pill.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States