The Columbus Dispatch

School choice advocates: Mandate open enrollment in all districts

- Anna Staver and Grace Deng

About 80% of Ohio’s public school districts allow kids from outside their borders to fill their open seats.

It’s called open enrollment, and the schools that don’t allow it are mostly affluent suburban districts that surround the state’s eight largest cities.

“I live between Dublin, Worthingto­n and Upper Arlington,” said Donita Brittman, a Columbus mom who sends her son to Clintonvil­le Academy using an Edchoice scholarshi­p. “I would consider sending my son to one of these schools.”

The districts say they don’t have room for more students, and they’d lose money by accepting them.

“We would have to tax our constituen­ts to additional­ly educate other students from other districts, and that will never fly,” Dublin City School Board President Lynn May said. “We would never deny anyone who moves in, but it’s a capacity issue for us.”

But Brittman sometimes wonders if there are other reasons.

Maybe the parents don’t want kids coming from outside the district. Maybe the schools are worried about test scores. Or maybe they see a single, African American

parent and make assumption­s about her family without knowing the full picture.

School choice advocates agree with Brittman. And that’s why they want to mandate open enrollment across Ohio.

“If people want to see systematic racism at work look at the map of districts that do and don’t allow it,” Center for

Christian Virtue President Aaron Baer said. “It is the most racist policy in Ohio, and it is perpetuate­d by the public school system.”

A proposal for statewide open enrollment

School choice advocates have wanted public schools to accept kids who don’t live in district since Ohio started open enrollment in 1989.

The Buckeye Institute, a conservati­ve think tank, has been working with Baer and Chad Aldis, vice president for Ohio policy at the Fordham Insititute, to craft a bill that would do just that.

The idea is to model legislatio­n from the rules Ohio’s open enrollment districts already use. For example, schools could say no to kids if their classrooms are nearly full. They could turn away students with significant disciplina­ry issues such as a string of suspension­s or expulsion.

And they couldn’t cherry-pick the best athletes, artists and musicians. Schools would have to give away their extra spots on a first-come, first-served basis or through a lottery. Though there could be exceptions for returning students and their younger siblings.

“I think it’s a great idea that we have a bill, that we have hearings ...,” Senate President Matt Huffman, R-lima, said. “But I think there will be a major backlash.”

The districts that don’t allow open enrollment are some of the wealthiest schools in the state, Huffman said.

“I think the lobbying effort would be so intense. People who have bought their house in say, Olentangy, bought the house so their kid could go there,” he said. “They don’t want a bunch of other kids going there. Plain and simple.”

‘Doughnuts’ around urban districts

If an open enrollment bill has a chance in Columbus, Huffman said supporters will need to rely on their data.

The Fordham Institute paid a University of Oklahoma professor who specialize­s in education policy to study Ohio’s open enrollment numbers.

The main takeaway, professor Deven Carlson said, was open enrollment doesn’t “meaningful­ly change segregatio­n levels either racial or socioecono­mic.”

Part of that is the number of students who participat­e in the program (about 85,000 of Ohio’s 1.65 million public schools students). But the other part is that the districts surroundin­g the schools where the majority of Ohio’s Black students live don’t allow open enrollment.

The pattern on the map is “striking,” Carlson said. “They’re effectively shutting off a means by which this program might integrate students across racial or socioecono­mic lines.”

Aldis described the rings around Ohio’s biggest districts as doughnuts. Columbus, for example, is almost entirely surrounded by districts that won’t accept transfers.

“I hate seeing these doors closed to kids,” Aldis said. “It’s so infuriatin­g. It’s so clear, and we’re all too polite to say so because you don’t throw around things like that.”

More than just an empty seat

Suburban school districts and their supporters say the map doesn’t tell the whole story.

Students who open enroll into another district bring their state dollars with them but not their local property taxes.

“The share coming from the state was never meant to cover the entire cost of educating a child,” said Tony Podojil with the Alliance for High Quality Education. “Where is that additional money coming from?”

Districts like Olentangy, Dublin and Upper Arlington get most of their funding from local property taxes. And they’re growing fast. Dublin has students taking classes in trailers, and its schools range from 73% to 131% full.

Even staunch supporters of school choice like Sen. Andrew Brenner, R-delaware, agreed that capacity is a real issue for some of these suburban districts.

The Olentangy district, which Brenner represents, is building a new school almost every year just to keep up with the number of people moving in.

But he thinks there are “other districts that may be concerned about student performanc­e and how open enrollment might impact their performanc­e.”

Making the numbers work

State Auditor Dave Yost analyzed four northeast Ohio school districts that had open enrollment policies in 2016 and found a mixed bag of results.

Hubbard Exempted Village School District northeast of Youngstown added more than $1 million to its budget through open enrollment. But Coventry Local

School District near Akron had a $1 million net loss.

“If you have open seats in the fifthgrade class, it costs you nothing to fill those seats with kids from other schools because you are already paying the teacher; you’re already paying the heat bill,” Yost said during a press conference at the time.

But there’s a point at which more kids means hiring more teachers or creating more classrooms. That costs more money.

Coventry decreased its open enrollment spots for the 2018-2019 school year, and then Superinten­dent Lisa Blough told The Canton Repository she believed “at times, we did take more than we should have.”

And that’s the tricky part, Podojil said. A seat that exists today might not be there next year or in three years when another 200 homes are built.

“What happens if I need that seat back,” Podojil said. “Do I send a kid back to Delaware schools after a year or two?”

The Edchoice alternativ­e

The workaround for students who want to get out of the public school system in places like Akron, Columbus and Cincinnati has largely been to find a charter school or take an Ed voucher for private school.

“The Edchoice scholarshi­p is the more politicall­y viable alternativ­e,” Huffman said. “In fact, the lack of open enrollment is part of the justification for expanding Edchoice. The kids don’t have any other choice.”

That’s what Jennifer Roberts did. She’s the mother of a daughter on the autism spectrum who struggled for years with the faculty at West Carrollton City Schools.

Roberts’ daughter is high functionin­g, but sometimes she gets overwhelme­d. She said the school would let her roam the halls to calm down. And if that didn’t work, they would tell Roberts to come pick her up.

“I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve been on the phone or down in the principal’s office ready to scream,” Roberts said.

She even considered selling her house to get out of the district. But then she heard about Ohio’s voucher program and got her daughter into Chaminade Julienne Catholic High School in Dayton.

It’s been a night and day difference, Roberts said. She finally feels like her daughter is in the right place with the right support system for her to thrive.

“I looked at open enrollment, but there are no other districts near us that offer it,” Roberts said. “There are plenty of other schools in the area I would have taken a look at if they were an option.”

The bigger issue

Rep. Phil Robinson, D-solon, isn’t opposed to mandating open enrollment, but the bigger issue for him is why families are so desperate to get out of these public school districts in the first place.

“The groups who are pushing for open enrollment, I would want those same folks to be passionate about school funding,” Robinson said.

Public education isn’t for every kid, but he thinks a lot of the students who take Edchoice scholarshi­ps or open enrollment transfers might stay if Ohio improved their local school.

“Ohio’s promise of a better life begins in the classroom,” Robinson said. “We have real inequities in our system. Shuffling kids between school districts doesn’t solve the problem.”

Anna Staver and Grace Deng are reporters

 ??  ?? for the USA TODAY Network Ohio Bureau, which serves the Columbus Dispatch, Cincinnati Enquirer, Akron Beacon
Journal and 18 other affiliated news organizati­ons across Ohio.
for the USA TODAY Network Ohio Bureau, which serves the Columbus Dispatch, Cincinnati Enquirer, Akron Beacon Journal and 18 other affiliated news organizati­ons across Ohio.
 ?? COURTNEY HERGESHEIM­ER/COLUMBUS DISPATCH ?? Most Ohio school districts allow students from other districts to enroll there. The ones that don't are primarily suburban and border the state's large urban districts.
COURTNEY HERGESHEIM­ER/COLUMBUS DISPATCH Most Ohio school districts allow students from other districts to enroll there. The ones that don't are primarily suburban and border the state's large urban districts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States