The Columbus Dispatch

Democrats tackle daunting tasks

Party faces flash points of taxes, health, climate

- Alan Fram

WASHINGTON – Revamp the tax code and important federal health care and environmen­t programs. Spend $3.5 trillion over 10 years, but maybe a lot less. Ensure that no more than three Democrats in all of Congress vote “no” because Republican­s will be unanimousl­y opposed.

Try to finish within the next couple of weeks. And oh yes: Failure means President Joe Biden’s own party will have repudiated him on the cornerston­e of his domestic agenda.

That’s what congressio­nal Democrats face as they try writing a final version of a massive bill bolstering the social safety net and strengthen­ing efforts to tame climate change. Here’s a guide to some pivotal differences they must resolve:

Price tag

The White House and top Democrats compromise­d on a $3.5 trillion, 10-year cost for the bill. That’s a huge sum, though a fraction of the $61trillion in federal spending already slated over that period.

Moderates led by Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona have said $3.5 trillion is too expensive, and votes from every Democrat in the 50-50 Senate are mandatory for success. Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have recently acknowledg­ed what seems inevitable: The final cost may have to drop.

Manchin has suggested limiting the total to $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion, which progressiv­es reject as paltry. Led by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-VT., they initially said at least $6 trillion was needed for serious efforts to help families and curb global warming.

Eventually a compromise will be reached, with some expecting it in the $2 trillion to $2.5 trillion range. But since House committees just finished crafting a $3.5 trillion version of the

package, a smaller price tag means some priorities would have to be trimmed.

Taxes

To pay for much of the bill, the House Ways and Means Committee approved $2.1 trillion in tax boosts, mostly on the rich and corporatio­ns. Some details and numbers seem likely to change.

Biden, who’s promised to not increase taxes on people earning under $400,000, will probably get his proposal to raise the top individual income tax rate on the richest Americans to 39.6%. That would be up from 37% approved under former President Donald Trump.

But Democrats also want to raise other levies on the wealthiest. It’s unclear which proposals will survive and in what form.

For example, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-ore., has expressed interest in boosting taxes on the value of some large estates that heirs inherit. Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal, D-mass., omitted that from his panel’s plan.

Democrats want to provide tax credits

for children, health care and child care costs and low-income workers. If the bill’s size shrinks, Democrats might save money by delaying, gradually phasing in or out or limiting some of those breaks. Some moderates say a proposed tax credit for buying electric vehicles shouldn’t go to higher-earning people.

Biden wants to raise the 21% corporate tax rate to 28% but may have to settle for around 25%. Democrats face other differences over taxes on corporate foreign income and stock buybacks.

Medicare

Three moderate Democrats blocked a House committee from approving a top priority for Biden and progressiv­es: saving hundreds of billions by letting Medicare negotiate lower prices for pharmaceut­icals it buys. Another committee approved the language, so it’s not dead.

Still, the plan is opposed by drug manufactur­ers and some moderates want to water it down.

Democrats planned to use the savings to pay for another progressiv­e goal: new dental, vision and hearing Medicare

coverage. If the drug-pricing language is diluted and produces less savings, it’s unclear how the Medicare expansion would be financed.

SALT and IRS

In a town that loves acronyms, SALT, shorthand for state and local taxes, is on the table.

Democrats from high-tax coastal communitie­s are demanding an increase in the current $10,000 limit on deductions taxpayers can claim for state and local taxes they pay.

With Pelosi unable to afford losing more than three Democratic votes, many think that deduction ceiling will be increased. To make up for the lost revenue, the IRS could be given extra money or banks might be required to report more financial transactio­n informatio­n to the IRS, ideas aimed at bolstering tax collection­s.

Other priorities

The House has proposed grants for power companies that move toward renewable fuels and fines on those that don’t, a pillar of the chamber’s climate change agenda. Manchin, chairman of the Senate energy committee and a fierce defender of his state’s coal industry, has told colleagues he opposes that.

The House has proposed a plan for mandatory family leave that’s significantly costlier than what Senate Democrats envision. And lawmakers await a decision from the Senate parliament­arian on whether language helping millions of immigrants remain in the U.S. violates budget rules and must be omitted.

Timing

Last month, Pelosi told moderates that the House would consider their top priority, a separate $1 trillion bill financing road and other infrastruc­ture projects, by Sept. 27.

In what seems a mutual political suicide pact, progressiv­es have threatened to vote against that bill unless unenthusia­stic moderates support the $3.5 trillion package. Ideally, Democratic leaders would love for both bills to be voted on together.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP FILE ?? Last month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told moderates that the House would consider a separate $1 trillion bill by Sept. 27.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP FILE Last month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told moderates that the House would consider a separate $1 trillion bill by Sept. 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States