The Columbus Dispatch

Should self-employed keep jobless benefits?

Ohioans were eligible through pandemic relief

- Titus Wu and Grace Deng

“I can’t even get a job as a dishwasher. At this point in my life, I don’t have anybody in my life to fall back on.”

For the first time last year, self-employed Ohioans were eligible for unemployme­nt benefits. More than 1.3 million people received assistance through the program prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

But benefits ended in early September, leaving hundreds of thousands of gig workers and freelancer­s in a lurch as the more contagious delta variant surges through Ohio. That’s a problem for Dave S., a freelance graphic designer from Cleveland who’s made a total of $25 from his work since the pandemic began. Dave asked for his name to be withheld for fear of backlash from the government for his criticism.

The 60-year-old sends out six to 10 resumes a week, but with a master’s degree in digital arts he’s overqualif­ied for most jobs available and thinks employers don’t want to hire him because of it.

“I can’t even get a job as a dishwasher,” Dave said. Dave was receiving the minimum amount of benefits, $189 a week, before the unemployme­nt program ended, barely enough to cover his utilities.

Without unemployme­nt benefits, Dave can’t pay for his phone service, internet, or electricit­y. That means he can’t apply for jobs unless he shows up at businesses to hand over his resume in-person. And with post-viral fatigue from COVID-19 and neuropathy in his feet, that isn’t really an option.

“At this point in my life, I don’t have anybody in my life to fall back on,” Dave said.

Dave is one of more than 200,000 self-employed Ohioans and other workers who applied for benefits through the Pandemic Unemployme­nt Assistance program and are now back to where they were before the COVID-19 pandemic – unable to get unemployme­nt benefits.

But the pandemic is still here, and the end of the Pandemic Unemployme­nt Assistance, often called PUA, has some pushing to permanentl­y include such workers in the benefits system. The chances of that? Not so great.

How COVID-19 changed the game

Before the virus, only full-time employees could withdraw from the unemployme­nt benefits system. An Ohioan has to work at least 20 weeks during a year-long base period, as well as make more than $280 a week during the employed weeks.

This disproport­ionately disqualifies workers of color, who are more likely to be gig workers. Women and workers of color are also heavily concentrat­ed in lower-wage occupation­s, meaning they’re barred from receiving benefits because they don’t make enough.

“This system was set up based on a completely different labor market than we are today,” said Jenna Gerry, attorney for the liberal think-tank National Employment Law Project. “It’s based on like a white male going to work working 9-5 as an employee.”

Ohio’s among the most restrictiv­e states in barring workers from receiving benefits due to personal circumstan­ces, according to the U.S. Government Accountabi­lity Office.

Without a safety net to fall back on, gig workers like Chad Greenwald have tried to act as their own safety net of sorts. Before the pandemic, the Dublin musician would play at weddings and events, teach and perform at bookings. If one source of income wasn’t flowing, he’d fall back on another source.

But then the pandemic happened, and almost all his revenue sources dried up.

Congress decided to send massive amounts of federal relief aid, allowing states to expand their

Dave S.

60-year-old with a master’s degree in digital arts but is overqualif­ied for most jobs available and thinks employers don’t want to hire him because of it. (He asked for his name to be withheld for fear of backlash from the government for his criticism.)

benefits system to include gig workers, independen­t contractor­s and self-employed folks for the first time, on the premise they were being hurt financially, too, by the virus.

Many of those types of workers, collective­ly known as “1099 workers” for the type of tax form they submit, were relieved when PUA was approved. Greenwald spent 30 or so hours on the phone and waited several weeks for unemployme­nt to roll in, but once he got his check, he said it was a “lifeline.”

“I got the back pay and all that, which was really nice, because I was mildly having panic attacks every day because there was no work for three months,” Greenwald said.

Should gig workers be included?

The inclusion of 1099 workers because of the pandemic was a huge step forward and shouldn’t be dialed back, said Zach Shiller, research director for the liberal-leaning think thank Policy Matters Ohio.

More and more of the economy is reliant on such freelance-type work, especially with the rise of technology enabling it, like Uber or Doordash. Nationally, there were around 59 million freelancer­s in 2020, up from 53 million in 2014, per Statista.

The significant number of Ohioans reliant on that work can be seen in how much money has been doled out.

Almost 1.3 million PUA claimants were paid between March 15 and July 26 of this year, totaling almost $11 billion. For the traditiona­l system, there were just around 1.1 million claimants receiving a total of around $12 billion.

Permanent inclusion is better for the economy, said Schiller, saying in the last recession, every dollar in unemployme­nt insurance generated $1.60 in economic output.

But Rea Hederman, who oversees research at the conservati­ve-leaning Buckeye Institute, said he sees why some argue that Ohio should have gotten rid of PUA earlier like other states did.

“You’re seeing a slower recovery in some of those industries, particular­ly dealing with... leisure or hospitalit­y, which impacts some of the gig worker economies,” he said. “Maybe your job is only working part time, after hours. You have a whole lot less incentive to return to work if you’re getting a full-time paid benefit.”

If anything, permanentl­y including gig workers could hurt that workforce, he added, especially if they’re being asked to pay into the system. With PUA, the money had come from federal aid.

“You could think about somebody who is maybe... an Uber driver or does paintings in their spare time,” he said. “You don’t want to have them have to pay full-time employment taxes on a part-time job, because it will discourage them from doing it.”

Even if a 1099 worker paid less into the benefits system and received less, it’s possible one might have to pay twice into the system for just having a second gig – which Rea said is disincenti­vizing.

Many gig workers said they’d be willing to pay into the system.

“I’m one of those weird hippie guys that likes helping other people,” Greenwald said, adding that it would be “silly” not to include gig workers in the unemployme­nt system because they’re still workers.

It all ties into the dilemma of how benefits for 1099 workers would be paid for. With regular unemployme­nt, it’s paid through state and federal taxes on employers.

Schiller believes that isn’t a huge problem to solve.

“The employers that employ these workers should be responsibl­e for them,” he said.

In fact, he believes some gig workers should be classified as regular employees, such as drivers under Uber – and those companies relying on gig labor would pay into the system.

Existing problems

Whether there is the willpower to figure out how gig workers pay into the system, among other details, is probably the biggest obstacle to permanentl­y including 1099 workers.

Both PUA and the traditiona­l unemployme­nt system have made headlines for being victims to fraud and their inability to handle the overwhelmi­ng number of recipients. Those have to be addressed first, said state Rep. Mark Frazier, R-newark, who co-chairs the legislatur­e’s council on unemployme­nt.

“It’s disingenuo­us of me to say that we’re going to be able to open up the traditiona­l system to a whole other population of people,” said Frazier. “It’s irresponsi­ble for me to not address that there’s a solvency issue in the state of Ohio, as well as a processing issue that needs to be addressed for the people that are currently entitled to benefits.”

His Democratic colleagues disagree. While there isn’t one clear path to adding in gig workers, that doesn’t mean lawmakers should examine the possibilit­y.

“Yes, there are issues with the system and it has its shortcomin­gs, but that should never hold us back,” said Rep. Lisa Sobecki, D-toledo, who is also on the council. “With the spread of the delta variant and low vaccinatio­n rates, Ohioans

are still at risk.”

The delta variant is still a real concern for gig workers – Greenwald said there are “rumblings” in the music world about venues canceling gigs due to the variant.

Proponents of adding in gig workers have pointed out that thanks to PUA, there’s already a base on which to build a system to permanentl­y include self-employed Ohioans. Matt Damschrode­r, head of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, was hesitant about that, noting there are still two separate systems.

“In order for it to be a truly efficient system, if we were to include those, I would want to see a greater integratio­n of the rules around PUA to look like traditiona­l unemployme­nt, so that we’re not operating two programs,” he said.

Income verification led to overpaymen­ts

One big difference between the two programs led to overpaymen­ts and fraud: income verification. With traditiona­l unemployme­nt, employers verify earnings. With PUA, 1099 workers self-certified their income before the federal government put in new rules for more verification.

While Schiller said those new rules are a good start to figuring out the verification problem, the change caused a hassle.

About 630,000 PUA claimants have been notified of non-fraud overpaymen­ts because of it.

“We were asking, ‘How much do you make a week?’ and they were thinking ‘How much I make per annum?’” said Damschrode­r. Then the new verification rules kicked in, showing overpaymen­t.

Bridget Robertson lost her job as an independen­t contractor painting houses after the business she worked at shut down due to the pandemic. She started bartending to make ends meet, but recently lost her job and is now searching for work. The state said she owes $10,000 in overpaymen­t.

“There’s absolutely no way I can do that right now,” said Robertson, who lives in Cleveland. “I’d probably be homeless.”

The situation is so stressful for Robertson she almost developed agoraphobi­a and had anxiety attacks every time she left the house. Robertson said all she could do was push through it.

“I had to go work, I have to go grocery shopping,” Robertson said. “Yeah, you have to live.”

Titus Wu and Grace Deng are reporters for the USA TODAY Network Ohio Bureau, which serves the Columbus Dispatch, Cincinnati Enquirer, Akron Beacon Journal and 18 other affiliated news organizati­ons across Ohio.

 ?? FRED SQUILLANTE/COLUMBUS DISPATCH ?? Chad Greenwald is a musician who didn’t have work during the pandemic. Unemployme­nt was a lifeline for him and now that he’s back on the road, he’s worried the delta variant will shut down gigs and he’ll be stuck with little to no income due to the September cutoff. Greenwald, left, does a lot to make ends meet including teaching; is this case he gives a lesson in his home to Nathaniel Forsberg, 16, on Sept. 1.
FRED SQUILLANTE/COLUMBUS DISPATCH Chad Greenwald is a musician who didn’t have work during the pandemic. Unemployme­nt was a lifeline for him and now that he’s back on the road, he’s worried the delta variant will shut down gigs and he’ll be stuck with little to no income due to the September cutoff. Greenwald, left, does a lot to make ends meet including teaching; is this case he gives a lesson in his home to Nathaniel Forsberg, 16, on Sept. 1.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States