The Columbus Dispatch

US needs to know what these UFOS, or UAPS, are

-

A few years ago, it would have drawn jokes and scorn. But given the mystery over what, exactly, U.S. military pilots are seeing in the skies, a congressio­nal proposal to create an “Anomaly Surveillan­ce and Resolution Office” – an office to investigat­e what used to be called UFOS – makes sense.

This is no laughing matter. In 2017, The New York Times reported that the U.S. military was gathering data from pilots who had reported unexplaine­d encounters during their flights. Recently released video of some of those encounters defies convention­al explanatio­n – objects moving at speeds and in ways that don’t conform with current aviation technologi­cal capabiliti­es. And unlike most of the wack-adoodle stuff from UFO culture, the Pentagon confirms those videos are real.

It’s not to say these are little green men. This could be Russian or Chinese or North Korean technology being taken out for a test-drive under the noses of American military pilots to gauge U.S. reaction. Among the most startling aspects of the Pentagon’s recent new openness on this topic is its acknowledg­ment that this isn’t one or two or a half-dozen unexplaine­d encounters. It’s happening with relative frequency, often in restricted airspace.

The acronym UFO – unidentified flying object – was a military creation from the 1950s but has since then been so thoroughly commandeer­ed by pop culture that the military has ditched it and now uses a new acronym: UAP, for “unidentified aerial phenomena.” (No doubt it’ll appear in the title of a Steven Spielberg film some time soon.)

The Pentagon this summer issued a report on UAP sightings that raised more questions than it answered. It found no solid evidence that the stillunexp­lained sightings were from global adversarie­s or ... something else ... but it encouraged political leaders to begin taking the issue more seriously than they traditiona­lly have.

Not so long ago, it would have sounded like science fiction, but today it makes perfect sense that Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., is proposing creation of the Anomaly Surveillan­ce and Resolution Office, dedicated to investigat­ing these sightings as they occur. Gillibrand has introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act establishi­ng the office.

“If it is technology possessed by adversarie­s or any other entity, we need to know. … Burying our heads in the sand is neither a strategy nor an acceptable approach,” Gillibrand told Politico last month. “I can count on one hand the number of hearings I had in 10 years on this topic. That’s fairly concerning given the experience our service members have had over the last decade.”

The idea has wide bipartisan support – a rarity these days, and an indication of how seriously this once-snicker-inducing topic is now being taken in Washington. For once, Washington is right.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States