The Columbus Dispatch

Householde­r asks to get bribery case against him dismissed

- Jessie Balmert and Laura A. Bischoff

Attorneys for former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householde­r asked a judge to dismiss the bribery case against him, saying federal prosecutor­s never proved the GOP lawmaker engaged in quid pro quo.

Federal prosecutor­s say Householde­r and others participat­ed in a conspiracy that funneled $60 million from Akron-based Firstenerg­y Corp. through political nonprofits that don't have to disclose their donors, often called dark money groups. The cash was used to return Householde­r to speaker and in turn pass and protect a $1 billion bailout bill to benefit Firstenerg­y and other utilities.

Householde­r, who has pleaded not guilty, faces a six-week trial as soon as this fall.

Prosecutor­s turned over more than 1.2 million pages of documents to bolster their assertions. But Householde­r's attorneys say the federal case against their client is flimsy.

“The government's motive in this case is clear: prosecute Householde­r based on headline-grabbing accusation­s of bribery, packaged in an inscrutabl­e RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizati­ons) conspiracy indictment,” wrote attorneys Steven Bradley and Mark Marein. “What the indictment does not make clear is how Householde­r's conduct amounts to a federal crime.”

Attorneys argued that federal prosecutor­s were using criminal law to enforce their own view of how the state should make policy.

Householde­r received campaign contributi­ons through Generation Now, a dark money group, but that money was a donation protected by the First Amendment – not a bribe, they wrote.

Householde­r also crafted legislatio­n, created House committees or voted on the nuclear bailout years after Generation Now received its first contributi­ons – and that gap in time matters, according to legal cases cited by defense attorneys.

“The government fails to sufficient­ly allege an explicit quid pro quo agreement,” they wrote, adding that what other defendants believed or understood about Householde­r's actions was irrelevant.

Householde­r's attorneys asked the federal judge to dismiss the entire indictment against their client – or at the very least, the alleged violations of state bribery law. Those charges can be prosecuted only if a case is brought against the politician at the Ohio Elections Commission, they wrote.

Federal agents arrested Householde­r , former Ohio GOP chairman Matt Borges, lobbyists Juan Cespedes and Neil Clark and political strategist Jeff Longstreth in July 2020.

Cespedes and Longstreth pleaded guilty, Clark died by suicide and Borges and Householde­r pleaded not guilty.

Householde­r asked the court to separate his case from Borges'. And he asked the court to limit what the jury may see in the criminal indictment, arguing that the words "Householde­r Enterprise" would unfairly prejudice jurors against him.

In July 2021, Firstenerg­y signed a deferred prosecutio­n agreement, admitted it used dark money to bribe Householde­r and former utility regulator Sam Randazzo and agreed to pay a $230 million fine.

Randazzo, who has not been charged, has maintained he did nothing wrong.

Federal prosecutor­s have until Feb. 22 to respond to the motions Householde­r just filed, according to the court schedule.

Read the motion to dismiss: Jessie Balmert and Laura Bischoff are reporters for the USA TODAY Network Ohio Bureau, which serves the Columbus Dispatch, Cincinnati Enquirer, Akron Beacon Journal and 18 other affiliated news organizati­ons across Ohio.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States