The Columbus Dispatch

GOP likely to maintain grip on Ohio government

- Thomas Suddes Columnist

Leaving aside, for now, possible Election Day consequenc­es if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, or further damning revelation­s in the House Bill 6-Firstenerg­y scandal, Ohio Republican­s are sitting pretty as the state slogs into Campaign ’22.

Republican Gov. Mike Dewine and Democrat Nan Whaley, once Dayton’s mayor, are vying for the governorsh­ip. And Republican J.D. Vance, a Middletown native, and U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, a suburban Warren Democrat, are competing to succeed Republican Sen. Rob Portman, of suburban Cincinnati’s Terrace Park. There are facts that separately favor Republican­s in each contest:

Fact one, as to Dewine-whaley: The last time Ohioans retired a Republican governor was in 1958. But voters have since retired three Democratic governors – Govs. Michael V. Disalle in 1962, John J. Gilligan in 1974 and Ted Strickland in 2010.

Fact two, as to the Vance-ryan contest: Since Ohioans began to directly elect senators in 1914 – by sending Republican Warren G. Harding to the Senate – there have been 10 Senate races, like this year’s, in which neither Ohio nominee was the incumbent. Republican­s won nine of those contests. (The exception: 1974, when Democrat John Glenn beat the GOP’S Ralph Perk, then Cleveland’s mayor.)

True, in Ohio elections, as in all things, history isn’t necessaril­y destiny. As the great historian Gordon Wood wrote, “If history teaches anything, it teaches humility.” So, at this stage of their campaigns, Whaley, for governor, and Ryan, for the Senate, stand every chance of besting Dewine and Vance, respective­ly. But to the extent the past can suggest patterns, they’re each going to have to campaign extra hard, and extra widely, in Ohio.

Also on the statewide ballot are races for attorney general, state auditor, secretary of state and state treasurer. Republican­s hold those posts now, and unless a scandal erupts, or someone dumps a ton of money into the campaigns of Democratic challenger­s for those offices, the Republican­s who hold them now are likely to be holding them next year.

Meanwhile, in the struggle for the Ohio General Assembly, Republican­s are well-positioned – again, absent further seamy revelation­s about the House Bill 6-Firstenerg­y affair.

Even if newly drawn General Assembly districts weren’t biased in favor of the GOP – and they are – Republican­s running for Ohio’s House and state Senate hold a huge fund-raising

edge over Democrats.

That's long been true at the Statehouse: Once a General Assembly caucus is in the minority (as state Senate Democrats have been since January 1985, Ohio House Democrats, since January 2011), its members basically become legislativ­e spectators, not billpasser­s. The people who fund campaigns, though, are usually looking for bill-passers, not bystanders. The lobbies are interested in results. And only a majority caucus can produce those.

Beyond Dewine-whaley and Ryanvance, this year's pivotal contests for people who ... invest ... in state government will likely be the race for three state Supreme Court seats.

To recap: Republican Chief Justice Maureen O'connor, who sided with Democrats in this year's fight over legislativ­e districts, is retiring. Competing to succeed O'connor: Democratic Justice Jennifer Brunner and Republican Justice Sharon Kennedy.

Seeking re-election are Republican Justices R. Patrick (Pat) Dewine, the governor's son (challenged by Democratic Court of Appeals Judge Marilyn Zayas, of Cincinnati) and Patrick Fischer (challenged by Democratic Court of Appeals Judge Terri Jamison, of Columbus).

Ohio Supreme Court contests have become even more critical for both parties: Because of Ohio's redistrict­ing mess, this year's wrestling match over General Assembly lines will play out again in 2023 and 2024 because the General Assembly districts used in this November's election will – depending on more courtroom jousting – be redrawn again for 2024's election.

Whether Brunner or Kennedy is elected chief justice, Mike Dewine would appoint a Republican to the remainder of either justice's term as an associate. That'd leave the court 4-3 Republican. But if Democrats unseated Pat Dewine or Fischer, that'd make the high court 4-3 Democratic – and utilities, insurance companies and the General Assembly's GOP caucuses very unhappy. They like things the way they are. But do ratepayers and policyhold­ers?

Thomas Suddes is a former legislativ­e reporter with The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and writes from Ohio University. tsuddes@gmail.com

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States