The Columbus Dispatch

Turkey quake revives debate on nuclear site

Officials defend design; critics express doubts

- Menelaos Hadjicosti­s and Jennifer Mcdermott

NICOSIA, Cyprus – A devastatin­g earthquake that toppled buildings across parts of Turkey and neighborin­g Syria has revived a longstandi­ng debate locally and in neighborin­g Cyprus about a large nuclear power station being built on Turkey’s southern Mediterran­ean coastline.

The plant’s site in Akkuyu, located some 210 miles west of the epicenter of the Feb. 6 quake, is being designed to endure powerful tremors and did not sustain any damage or experience powerful ground shaking from the 7.8 magnitude earthquake and aftershock­s. But the size of the quake – the deadliest in Turkey’s modern history – sharpened existing concerns about the facility being built on the edge of a major fault line.

Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned company in charge of the project, says the power station is designed to “withstand extreme external influences” from a magnitude 9 earthquake. In nuclear plant constructi­on, plants are designed to survive shaking that is more extreme than what’s been previously recorded in the area they’re sited.

The possibilit­y of a magnitude 9 earthquake occurring in the vicinity of the Akkuyu reactor “is approximat­ely once every 10,000 years,” Rosatom told The Associated Press via email last week. “That is exactly how the margin of safety concept is being implemente­d.”

An official with Turkey’s Energy Ministry, when contacted by the AP, said there were no immediate plans to reassess the project. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in line with government protocol. Some activists, however, still say the project – the first nuclear power plant in Turkey – poses a threat.

Nuclear facilities are constructe­d of heavily reinforced concrete, sized for significan­t earthquake shaking and far more robust than commercial buildings, said Andrew Whittaker, a professor of civil engineerin­g at the University at Buffalo who is an expert in earthquake engineerin­g and nuclear structures.

The fact that it’s sited off the western end of the East Anatolian Fault, which was linked to last week’s powerful tremor, suggests that the design would have been checked for significan­t shaking,

Whittaker added.

Still, Whittaker said, it would be prudent to reassess seismic hazard calculatio­ns in the region for all infrastruc­ture, including the plant. “There’s no reason to be concerned, but there’s always a reason to be cautious,” he said.

That’s little comfort to activists in Turkey and on both sides of ethnically divided Cyprus. They’ve renewed their calls for the project to be scrapped, saying that the devastatin­g earthquake is proof of the great risk posed by a nuclear power plant near seismic fault lines.

In a statement to the AP, the Cyprus Anti-nuclear platform, a coalition of over 50 Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot environmen­talist groups, trade unions and political parties, said it “calls on all political parties, scientific and environmen­tal organizati­ons and the civil society to join efforts and put pressure on the Turkish government to terminate its plans for the Akkuyu nuclear power plant.”

Cypriot European Parliament member Demetris Papadakis asked the European Commission what immediate actions it intends to take to halt the plant because of the dangers posed by building a nuclear power station in a seismic

zone so close to Cyprus.

Nuclear power plants worldwide are designed to withstand earthquake­s and shut down safely in the event of major earth movement – about 20% of nuclear reactors are operating in areas of significan­t seismic activity, according to the World Nuclear Associatio­n.

Turkish nuclear regulators provided the license for the plant’s constructi­on in Akkuyu in 1976 following eight years of seismic studies to determine the most suitable location, but the project was slowed down after the Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986. Constructi­on of the first reactor started in 2018. Large nuclear power plants have traditiona­lly taken a while to build because of the size, scale and complexity of the infrastruc­ture, and delays associated with first-of-a-kind plants.

According to Rosatom, a study by Turkey’s Office for the Prevention and Eliminatio­n of Consequenc­es of Emergency Situations indicates that the site in Akkuyu – some 60 miles from Cyprus’ northern coastline – is located in the fifth degree earthquake zone, which is considered the safest region in terms of earthquake­s.

There’s a political dimension to qualms about the plant: Cyprus has accused Turkey of augmenting the Turkish

Cypriots’ dependence on it in order to entrench the island’s ethnic division. Turkey has said it would supply the breakaway Turkish Cypriot north of the island with electricit­y through an undersea cable. A pipeline suspended a couple of hundred yards under the Mediterran­ean’s surface is already supplying the north with water.

The plant, whose first of four reactors is scheduled to go online later this year, will have a total capacity of 4,800 megawatts of electricit­y, providing about 10% of Turkey’s electricit­y needs. According to government figures, if the power plant started operating today, it could single-handedly provide enough electricit­y for a city of about 15 million people, such as Istanbul, Rosatom added.

 ?? PLANET LABS PBC VIA AP ?? A satellite image shows the Akkuyu nuclear power plant under constructi­on on Turkey’s southern Mediterran­ean coastline. The size of the devastatin­g Feb. 6 earthquake sharpened existing concerns about the facility being built on the edge of a major fault line.
PLANET LABS PBC VIA AP A satellite image shows the Akkuyu nuclear power plant under constructi­on on Turkey’s southern Mediterran­ean coastline. The size of the devastatin­g Feb. 6 earthquake sharpened existing concerns about the facility being built on the edge of a major fault line.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States