The Commercial Appeal

Buyers, beware of contaminat­ion

- By Don Wade

To Jonathan Hankins, his story is also a valuable public service announceme­nt: “This could happen to anybody.”

Last June, for $36,000, Hankins bought a Freddie Mac foreclosur­e in tiny Klamath Falls, Ore., near the California border. Although the two-bedroom house appeared in local police reports as a place where arrests had been made for meth traffickin­g, Hankins says, there was no documentat­ion of meth manufactur­ing.

Soon enough, Hankins and his wife, Beth, and their 2-year-old son, Ezra, began having multiple health problems. They all suffered from dry mouth. His wife and son had mouth sores and trouble breathing. He had nosebleeds and a severe sinus headache.

After three weeks, they moved out. They also spent $50 for a meth test and when the results from the lab came back they discovered the home had a contaminat­ion level almost 80 times greater than permissibl­e under Oregon law.

“With all these foreclosur­es coming on the market, it’s sort of like land mines,” Hankins says.

From 1999 to 2011, the Drug Enforcemen­t Administra­tion reported uncovering 21,000 residentia­l meth labs. Their addresses are documented in the agency’s Clandestin­e Drug Lab Registry (justice.gov/dea/clanlab/index.shtml).

An analysis of state laws by Scripps Howard News Service found that Oregon is one of 28 states with a specific meth disclosure law pertaining to the purchase of a home. In several other states, once the property has been cleaned up, or “remediated,” the owner does not have to tell a buyer about meth contaminat­ion. Only 17 states have meth-specific laws requiring landlords to disclose meth contaminat­ion to tenants. And car sellers in 42 states don’t have to tell buyers about potential meth residue.

(Under Tennessee law, motor vehicles that are found to have meth contaminat­ion are impounded, with a notice submitted to the Department of Revenue. The vehicle’s certificat­e of title and any subsequent transfer documents will have the words “Methamphet­amine Vehicle” on the front.)

Freddie Mac spokesman Brad German said in a statement the lender knew nothing of the Hankins’ house’s meth history: “The Hankins family chose to forgo a home inspection or any other environmen­tal test and bought the home in ‘as-is’ condition.”

Hankins agrees he waived the inspection. He also points out that a meth test is not part of an Oregon home inspection. He hasn’t hired a profession­al to decontamin­ate his house because he was told it would cost more than the house was worth. Now Hankins may have the house torn down and the property excavated.

Experts are divided on the degree to which any contaminat­ed home can be rehabbed, how much it should cost, and even how much meth exposure is truly harmful.

Garth Haslem, a Utah certified decontamin­ation specialist, believes meth contaminat­ion fears are overdone and says he can clean up a 2,000-square-foot house with minor contaminat­ion for $3,000 to $4,000.

Patrick Berge, a program specialist with the Nebraska Department of Environmen­tal Quality, spent several years as a graduate assistant at the University of Tennessee cooking meth in a laboratory setting.

“Even with a controlled cook, you still get meth everywhere,” he says.

Asked if he would consider buying a home that had been contaminat­ed by meth and then cleaned and declared safe, Berge laughs and says, “No. I would not buy a property that had a meth cook on it. Not even one.”

What matters, says Caoimhin P. Connell, a forensic industrial hygienist in Bailey, Colo., is whether the meth left behind rises to a level of “toxicologi­cal significan­ce.”

Even smoking meth leaves a residue. For his own “academic amusement,” Connell says he tested five rooms in a cheap motel in Tulsa, Okla. All tested positive for meth, though only one had significan­t levels.

he Scripps analysis of state laws showed just 14 states require hotels to disclose meth contaminat­ion.

Through the website Change. org, which promotes social change by petitions, Hankins is expressing his frustratio­n with Freddie Mac. Still, he’s not bitter.

“It’s an ugly situation,” he says, “but we feel blessed we got out when we did.”

 ??  ?? THE COMMERCIAL APPEAL FILES Special Agent Jeffrey Scott of the DEA says cleaning up a meth lab is labor-intensive and dangerous. Fumes from chemicals used in meth production can cause long-term respirator­y problems, so cleanup requires hazardous...
THE COMMERCIAL APPEAL FILES Special Agent Jeffrey Scott of the DEA says cleaning up a meth lab is labor-intensive and dangerous. Fumes from chemicals used in meth production can cause long-term respirator­y problems, so cleanup requires hazardous...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States